The Guthrie Daily Leader. (Guthrie, Okla.), Vol. 31, No. 13, Ed. 1, Friday, May 29, 1908 Page: 3 of 7
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: Oklahoma Digital Newspaper Program and was provided to The Gateway to Oklahoma History by the Oklahoma Historical Society.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
crystal AWossie. Court Decision
A Trip To Japan
The Will 0 CrossJ
Musical Comedy
Company
'he Treat of the
Season
Beautiful Chorus
ff
Funny Comediaiis
ALL STAR CAST
Prices - 10S2030c
City Directory-
INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE.
TOWEL SUPPLY
UUTHR.E TOWEL SUPPLY.
J v. citATS. l'roprletor.
Towels and Anroua ot all kinds tut
inlshod nt very reasonablo rates. Bee
' ime beforo you buy. J. D. Ornr
rilONel TCO. G10
A R M LOAN
J. D. tuMKE J
Lottem of Inquiry Promptly Answers
107 8. Division 8L auLlirlo OW.
09300000000000t
o
HV C. M. QRANT a
O Auctioneer 0
f9 17 Yearn Exporlonco Orylna O
41 Bales Call up 'iibone 7G st Q
f0 tny expense a
m n. M. GRANT.
O Auctioneer D
jFnrm Loans R.cal Estate
Fire. Lightning Tornado c
cidont. Plate Ciln$sandaU pWicr
sinsuraucc " -
F. A. Googi&s
Phone 864 1 20i W. Okla. Ave
Will bring you the
s a
m niter fioai I
(By Mail)
From now until alter
election.
Keep informed? Cut
but this ad. roll in it n
aO f
rU
Bill and mail to Daily
Leader Guthrie Ok-
lahoma.
Saturdayay 30:i;8
at 2 0 clock p. m-
Auction Corner Div & Cleve.
I mil s II at Public Auction
to the holiest bidder for cash
all lay
Household Furniture
A cotnpictL line of hoys-hold
and l'itrh"n furniture Snitir-
lay. May Ji 1903 2 o'clock p m
MttS O It GREEN
E A iloU Auctioneer
111! if a h s 5 h s&
n f IS-A tU
wa iimi n pi u a
LAS kbS9J$
Construction of
Seminole Treaty
of 1897
jIukAofof T. TjGodfrS 'Mr tiff
frva inTaiiH THift u3:." J." .laft.
gee which was ileclded yesterday In
an opinion by Chelf Justice Wllllmoi
l ixThaua the inom ltniiortnut of the
one hundred opinions handed down by i
the state supreme court idjico Its or-
Ktiuir.niiun.
Tie case Involves mlllloiiB of dol-
lars It pnsslng upn 0i ciuestlDn of
"Whather the deeds to Setnlnnln In
dian lands to which iio imwnta were
Issued wc e -valid after tbe removal
of tho -rest lotions. The optjilon Is a
construction on tho Seminole Treaty
of 1897 and by reason o' the fact that
tho majority of the other treaties of
tho Five Clvilld tribes ftre drawn
similar the questltn will also apply to
Rtniilar cases n those nations. It is
est laiated by persons who are familiar
nlt.i In. Han affairs that $5000000
worth of property is Involved In the
case Chief Justice WilllmnB has spent
nuirh time In the preparation of this
opinion. The opinion In full 1. lis fol
lows.
IN THE SUPIIKME COUKT OF THE
8TATB OV OKLAHOMA
i No. 700.
T. J. Godfrey Plaintiff In Iflrror
vs.
Iowa Land and Trust Company De
fendant In lirror.
(Syllable by the Cort.)
A oltlaiott of tho Seminole nation
not of Indian blood after Retorting
Ills allotment nnd receiving his cor-
tircnt of allotment from the chair-
man of the Commission to the five
flvilIgiM trlbr-s a provided for b
the ajrupment of ilir- 10 day of Decern
er A. D 189". on the vast of the
Seminole trlha of Indians with the
United Stales ratified by an net of
Congress f the 1st day of .lul A
D. 1X08 lifter the romnsal of re
Htrletlons on tho nllpnatinn of alloti-d
laud by the member of said tribe
by act of C'miKr- of April 21 1004
when no patent has been Issued oi do
llvi red to Huch all ttee or citizen
nifty evecu'e a deed or conveyance
to that part of fils or her allotment not
designate! by him or her rfs big or
her homestead.
Error from th- United Slates Court
for the Western District of the In
dlan Territory Muskogee.
11 in. Wm. It. Lawrence Trial .Indite
lliwin & Uaniey Attorneys for
Plniti.lIT in Hrror.
Thmnas &Demeilcs Attorneys fin
Dcfendr- -n Error
S V T ; VIENT O F PACTS .
On the 10th day of Apill A. D
1U0G. the plaintiff tn rrro- as plaintiff
In the court lol w filed firat amended
oonplaint aKBlnst the defendant in er
ff)T the ilefendan't 111 '-aid court seek
I.ntf io have a obtain deed declared
"moitage Hofei-cnco Ix'-oin will be-
made to the parties .la hy apiieared
In the court below
1'lntntlff ns a resident of the State
of Kamuu. alleRed that the deJadHirt
was a corporAtk n o ;anl-ed under
the laws In force In t no Indian Ter
: tor villi ' pilncipu; place of linai-
ii rb at Mi . osee nn-l for cause of
tloii Mated that -n April 29. 1905
ie bought from r.- Itobeit James a
certain descr'- i tract of land sit
uated I nthe Siuuln Je luitlou. Uehecca
Jumcs the wlte of said grantor. Join-
ing with him '" ehIiI leet in execut
Ing and dellveilng a deed witn coven
ants of general warranty conveying
to plaintiff tnhl land which mild deed
wns filed for record in the proper re
cording district wherein the land was
Mtuatod to-wtt at Wewoka. A copy
of Raid deed hi attached ti said com-
plaint and Is In proper form and con-
tain i full and .complete covenants of
warranty In fee simple.
Said Robert Junius- va an enroll-
ed citizen of the Stmluole nation not
of Indian blood nd as such allottee
icclvd from th calrujfin of the com-
mission of the fl n olvlllzed tribes
certificates of allotment one bearing
date of June 16th 1VW1 and the other
June ZfMi 1902 deacrUiluE the lnd in
"0..trjvrsy. Said certificates were
atached to said corn plaint and Identl
f'ed an pioper exhibits He further
allegi -i Uiat prior U the execution
n.l delivery to him of said deed b)
thd granUr that 'aid Itobert Jaine3
(iuiveed said land to the defeudaut
Tie Iowa land A Trust Conipan
U an instruiiient of writing in the
bhape and form of a deed for the con-
M.leiaiion of f2!0 and that said tit-
ni umeut bear date of Novembci
Jul 1WI ami wus executed and df
;. iid by huid grantoi t the said de
I Lint tor the pui pose of securing
i . .: i'i ilntilT attaches a copy of said
li- I to hitld complaint as a part there
o and Identified wime u. an exhibit
alleging that said deed was for th
puriKKie of securing burrowed oione
and heln; t underttood at the time
b all 1'rtUw thereto ami was Intend
cd for the purpose of Heeuilng tbe pa
nu m o la note t videnelng a debt for
such lion owed imuies and that when
the plaintiff become the purchaser of
said laud on April t'D 1905 he pui
chafed same from bind giantoi with
tli- uh.lt-i mhiuI'iik lint hai'l inbtru
ineni in fiinr I the defend.) rits whk
i
TB3fK"" Jtjk 's lne )y of the household for
lIT 1 without it no liappiness can be
HvWi'Tr nPlSln tcspgiptpte. How sweet' the
oJfwS of moher and b
l tf angclssmileatandconimendihe
W JL ejkmtiOf thoughts and aspirations of the
mother bending over thetruUle The ordeal through which theexpeot-
ant mother must pas is such that slip look forward to the hour when
she .shall feel the eKqumtc tin ill of motherhood with dread Every
woman should know that the danger and pain of child birth can be
avoided by the use of Mother's Friend a liniment for external use
which toughens and renders pliable all the pads a -siting jiature in its.
wnrl- Kv Ha nu1 thnimimK nt BK a
women have passed this cpms
in safety and with little pain
Svkl at 0v r Untie ly iruy(lli
Vulutljlo Wok Ut am et free.
HftAOriELB HCBULATmft ttp.
THBtM)ER. 0UTHBIE
Involves Mill
merely a n(6rtgnge and In thesettle
! meiit bciwpieji the plaintiff And "the
said rantm). It wax so agreed at the
time nnd a sufileloht silm wns to-
aer.'el bj tile plrtlntlff out of the oou-
Ideratlon for the payment of said
land to take up the said note held by
the said defendant In order L have
cancelled aud set aside tho deed held
by It.
Plaintiff alleges that he has made
an effort to settle with tho defeud-
aud au dlJiat defendant refused t
uoltlo for less than four hundred dol-
!a which 1 in excess of the mort
gage debt; that ho now offers to aj
Inti court as a tender to '. fendant
nrl!i"lal ami Interest due on the
aforesaid loan mado by tho defendant
to Robert .lames
Plaintiff further ulleges that the
said It bert James the grantor lu
plaintiff's deed is a citizen of the
Seminole nation not of Itidlnu blood
and It la further nllegud that no patent
hap been Issued and delivered to him
by the Principal Chief last elected by
the Semlnolo tribe as provided In the
Seminole agreeniont of December 1C
1S97; that no patents have been de-
livered ami executed by said Princi-
pal Chief to any of the citizens f
the Seminole nation whether of in-
lian blood or not of Indian blood.
Plnlntlff furUior aliases Hint snhl
Robert .lames heretofore mentioned
hna selected Ills homesUdd out of the
'ami nlloltoil to him In the Seminole
nation and that the land described
.n defendant's complaint i sno part
of tlie Jioinesteud of H bart James.
Plaintiff further alleg-d that said
note evidencing the debt due by said
Robert James Is now ami was duo and
0Aa1iIe t the time this nctlon was
instituted.
Whoiv-foro plaintiff prays that said
deed or livsttument of writing be de
dared In fact and In equity a mort
giige and as audi foreclased by pro
per decree divesting tit title out of
the defendant nnd vostlng It In the
plaintiff bolug upon tin payment of
the nniuunt of Indebtedness due the
defendant by an Id Robert James on
aid note and If said relief can not
'to granted a commission appointed
recouvey the title by deed to the
ilnlntirf and such other ami gonornl
-dinf as it tnay bo ontitled to.
Thtnealter on the 21th dnv of April
'90fi the dcfendniit demurred to Mild
imeiiiled complaint for thp reasor
th it the fdot therein stated wore not
nifflclent to constitute a cause of net
Ion; and thereafter on the 2GUi dny of
June 1906 said demurrer was by the
court sustained to which action it
the time plaintiff then and thero ox
Mpted andf defendant falling to Ulead
further to a decree was therein render
ed In favor of the defendant dismiss
Ing plaintiff's amended complaint and
taxing nil the costs against him plain
tiff al the time duly saving his ex
cepilon to the action of the court
Thereafter the plaintiff duly prose
cuted Its appeal to the United State
C'jurt of Appeals .f the Indian Ter
rltory and the same i now properl
before this court b virtue of the pio
visions of the Enabling Act for i'e
termination .
Opinion J the Court:
H Williams C J : The question
to be adjuoatod In this case is whothor
or not a citizen of the Seminole na
tU n not of Indian blood after select
ng his allotment ami receiving his
certificate of alktmont '.rom the
chairman of tho commission to tho
five i.-Ivtlld tribes ne .provided for
by tho agreement of tho lflth day of
December A. D. 1807 ort tho part of
the Somlnolo nation of Indians with
the United States nf America ratified
by pn act of CotiKroaa approved on tho
1st day of July. lSflS. (80 Hta. at Largo
GC7; Kapplor's Indian Affaire Iawa
and Treatlq second Ed. Vol 1 p.
GC2) can mnko a valid sale dood or
ctmveyanoe to that part of his or her
a'lotment not selected as his or hop
homestead after the removal of the
restrictions on the alienation b the
tndltn Apprnpilatiori Act approved
April 21 t0l although no patent had
been issued tr delhered to such al-
lottee before he undertakes to alien
ate the same
That we may properly understand
tht proiloui of the Seminole Tieaty
of 1807. it la iiuiKirtant that we ex
diuiuo the treaty made and conclu led
at Washington D. C March 21 '866
between the Uulted States (iovern
meut aud tht Heiuin le iiaiion and
ratlfle.1 on the 10th ta of July 1808.
It la by virtue of this treaty that the
Seminole acquired the title or right
to the propert) In contrversy. Arti-
cle of nald treaty 1 1 gtat. at Largo
755; Kiik;r's Indlun Affairs Laws
und Treatlea Vp. 2 p Oil) provides
as follows:
The I'uUed States bavins obtain-
ed by grunt f the C're-1 nation the
westerly half of their lanns hereby
grafts to tbe Seminol ivatlon the
iKirtlou thereof hereafter Jeecrlbe!
which shall contUute the National
domain -i tho Beminole Iadlau.x Std
l.iihU so granted by the United States
JAnHHHIMlVTI
nojsun
OKLA. FRTDAY MAY
OppipsBy
Chief Justice
WUiams
ions
tj tin Seminole nation nrn lioundcd
and described its follow) tO'Wlt-
"In consideration of snhl ooShIoii of
two hundred thousand acres of land
desarlbeil above the flonilliole nntl n
ngrecw to pa therefor tho prion of flfti
eonte per aero nmoutitlng to U)e um
or ono hundrod thoungml dollars which
amount shall lip deducted by the sum
pitltl by tho United Statu tor Btnnliioiej
laml8 iindor tho stipulations nbotc
written
Soctlon 16 of an Act of Congress np
proved March 8. 1801 (27 U. S. Stat !
at 1-arpo C15) In part Is us follows.
"The consent of the United Stau-h I
Is hereby given to the nllotiiienr of I
aiuis in aevo.uii) not oxcoedliig one
huiiilrl and slxtj acres to any one
ndlvidusl within the limits of the
ountry oocupled b tiio Clicokee.
Creek. Choctnws ChicknauwH ami
Somlnoles and ujion sitoh nlMmeiit
the individuals to whom tho same max
be allotted shall be deemed to be in
all proper respects citizens ot the lTu
Red Statos."
Said net further provides for the
appointment of oiinmlssloiiera le en
ter Into negotiations with tho fle
clvllUod trltiw Tor the purposes of r.
tlnguishlbji; 'liiolr fintionnl and tiibal
Utlos to land. S-Jctlou 10 of Bald Act
1b In part ns follows:
"Tho president slinll nominate and
by and with the advice and consent
ot tho Senate shall appoint three com
nilssloncrs to ontor Into negotiations
with tho Cherokee nation tho Ch
taw nation. tb0 Ohlcltosaw nntlgn Hie
Muskogeo (or Creok) nation tho Som-
inolo niitloii for the purpose of ex
tiiigulshment of tho national or trlbnl
title to any lauds within that Iti-I
tor.i now hold by any and all of nuch
natlonB o r tribes olthor liy cesulon
of tlie sumo or some part thereof to
ho United States. r bj the allot neii
ind division of tho same In several!)
among tho Indians of such nations or
tribes rospoptlvel) a s may be en
titled to tho samo or by such othei
'iiothod as may be agreed upon be
tweeu tlie several nntl ns and tribes
iforesnld or ouch of them with the
United Stntoa wllli a view to mich
adjustmout upon the basis of jus
tlco nnd oqulti" as may wljh thp con
omit of Biioh nations or Irlbaa of In
dlaus so far as may be ueccssnn. be
roiiulslto and suitable to onablo the
ultlmato creation of a statu or states
o fthe Union which shall ombrnce the
lauds within said Indian Tort-it r "
When wo consider tho foregoing ex
orpts from tho net of March 3 Ji0.1
light Is ahod upon the agreumeiit af
turwnrds outeied Into on the lCth da
of December 1897 herotofcro refer
red to. The said agreement In part
provides ns follows:
A lauds belonging to Uio Seminole
tribe of Indians shall he divided in
-o three grados designated as the firi-t
second and third and the
saint shall be divided among the mem
bers of the tribe so that each shall
have an Quul shere thereof in value
so far aa may be. the location and
rertilit) of the soil considered giving
to each the right to select his allot-
ment so an to Include any improvement
thereon owned by him nt the time
and each allottee shall have the sole
right of occupanci of tnc laud so al
lotted to him during tho existence of
the present tribal government and un-
til tho members of such tribe shall
become clUsens of the United States.
Such allotment shall bo made under
tho direction and supervision of tho
Commission to tho five civilized tribes
in o nnectlon with rapreaentatlvq ap-
ointed by tho UfbaJ government; ami
tho chalnmn t HUld conunlsstou sl;all
exocuio and ((oller to wicli allottee
u certificate defioiiblng therein tlie
and allottod to him.
Obvlousl) upon th? selection of his
allotment and tho receipt by tho al-
lottee ot a certificate signed by the
Chairman of the Commission af the
five civilized tribes tho land de-
scribed in said ccrtUicnte wax segre-
gated fro mthe rminan mas of Sem-
inole laud It could not therefore be
allotted to any other cltisen. The al-
lottee could not be deprived of the
him either fcy the federal government
or the Indalli tribes.
lu the cant Wirih '. Urauson 9
Otto (U. S) 118 the court mated;
The ioe is well settled b a long
ouro of decisions that wlie e cub
Kc lends have been survejed and
placed in the market. orothtrwlst
ojiened to private acgulnitUm. a per
son compUvs with all Ute reiulUcs
uaoessari to uutitle him t a paieni
for a particular lot or ttrt (dial) be
retarded as thy equitable owner there-
of and the land Is no longer open to
selecttoo. The public fslth iisa be-
come pledged to him and un subse-
quent grant ot the souk i.uid to
another uart u vend unless tho first
selection or entry b vacated and sat
aside."
Ip tlie case of Landea v Hi iu.it 10
How. (U. S.) 372. the oouit sjiys.
"Cruise ou Uea.1 Prousrty Vol 3.
p. bio 511) lays down the iQiriue
with great distinctness lie m)':
Thar is no nil baiter founaed lu
law raason. and oOiwcJouce tbu tlibi.
that sji the several aeu ami remon- j
lea ueceswiry tQ eompbjic a ionye
ance slia.ll be taken twetbi-i onejL
act and operate from the subkUntl&l
part by reltuUm-
"For tbe purpose of UiIb cate (with-
out pruiMisinR t. apply the tule to1
ever) other i we may assume that the
Hifet a't of Claymo-gan -naf that pf
filing hi- tliU' paiierjg and clan.i iHth
tbe recordei of lanl titles ixiording
to the lounh hodUm of tlu att of
.Maih ? 1S05; tlii was let.a'1 done1
and the papers !' urUed He Ulined
un.ler the seoond -ot-U'in ' th ac
af 16115 which wat atnnd-l u tbe act
of 1S06 and skhIii b) the an ' IM'l.
At already stateil. ly the fom li er-l
tloii of this last act. tin der ion ofi
the boad of commissioners auiiotntef
tj lcvestlgate uch clalnto made
final usalimt the '-nltd Biats audi
v 1 1
29. 1908.
rri3KSr
I What Woulc! You - Think
" of a Man" I
py TMf1isTTT-iTwnils 'TrtTWm MffTffnfTwBcB!scWjifftMsTTjH 1
11
VYHO in trying to sell you his merchandise should approach
you with he expression: "You arc now sir about to
enter into negotiations for a piano wiih a very honest agent if I
do say it sir and I trust you will listen super-credulously to me
regardless of what your friends may say or what y6ur experience
may have taught you!" That is the substance pf what some
agents will tell you. We have a large variety of the very best
pianos rnanufactur.eqjj including the
Cbickering Bros. Knabe Kimball Packard Smith
- i inii.il it . . ! ! . -.
. J.J . . . . r . . . . r ill . . .. L.
- .W "T -
$ Barnes Hi Schulz Story & Clark
HP - fUSIl IS PIWPSirIIWIISSSSiMWISlWSWSSSBlliaWWSP-ISMSSWMWISSW (IIMSIWiIWS
And man' others. We are not only not controlled
by any tactory or factories in the vvordt neitper are
we controlled by any pianc company in Kansas City
or Oklahoma City as soqie agents in Guthrie axe.
WE MAKE OUR OWN
And TERMS and they are the LOWEST that can
be found.
aasssssttssKfxssBfssss
Emm lis FilifeP'pl
Oldest
He Starves You From
$50 to $150 on oc Piano.
3!fBWfflntatMwggaaa
he was entitled to a patent Ilia legal and (uultablo aapoct It Is cou- "Acoi ilm? io the woll known mods
claim was full) within the. - visions idaed hh bolongliiK to the realty of pro-eeiiing ut the Innd offices (oo-
of tho act of 1805 and 18(J Now why can not suoh property be tahlished tLr the mutual convonleno
"Applying to. the doctrine of relation taxed b It proper dvnoinlnation as jf buyer ami sdler). If the party Is en
and taking all tho several parts and real estaf .' In the wrds of tli ' titled b) law to enter tho land the
ceromonloa necessary to complete statute "as lands owned by ncr -esl- receiver glveg him a certificate of en-
the title together "as one act" then ' denU " And If tho name of tl owner try reciting the facta by moans ot
Uio coufimatlou of 1811 nud the patent! could not be ascertained the tract wlileh. In due time ho receives Ik
of 1846 must bo taken to relate the was required to bo de..-rlbcd by its patent.
first act; that ot filing the claim In boundaries or any particular name. The contrail of purehnso is'comuleto
1805. On tills assumption lntertnedl- W? can ascertain no doubt that the cm- when the certificate of outry is oxecut-
ato convoyaiicoB made by the oon -
tlrmoo or by tho sheriff on his behalf
of a dfito after tho first substantial
act arc coverod by tho lfgul tltlo.
and pass that title to. nllouu. And
on this ground the deed made by tho
sheriff to MoJfnlr Is valid."
In the cas of Carroll v. S afford. 3
How. -100 tho court soys: "Uut lnd
potidontly of tho knee of UMigo wa
think the construction Is sustainable
When the laud wns purchased and
paid for it was no longer the property
of the United States but l tlie pur-
chaser lie held It for final certifi-
cate which could no more be can-
celled by the Unite''. Slates than a
pateul it is true if the land bad boen
previously sold by the United States
iv reserved from bale the certificate
o- patent might foe recalled by the
United State as having been issued
through mistake. In this respect there
U no difference between the certifi-
cate lralder ami tbe patentee.
"It Is said the fee Ik not in the pur-
chasei. but in the I'ulu-d Status until
the patent shall be issued This U
so. technically at law but not In
nilt The land la the dan. Ik of Mi-
purchaser Is real etate dbconda to
bis iiv'rs. and does not jo to bis ex
eoutoru or adurlnM raters. In every
Thqre is no need of
effect a quick cure
Chamberlain's Oolic Cholera
and Diaritot
In fact in most cases one dose is sufficient It never fails and can be
relied upon in the most severe and dangerous cases. It is equally
valuaWe for children and is tho means of saving the lives of many
children each year. In the world's history no medicine has ever met
with greater success. Price 25 cents. Large size 50 cert.
Music Store in Oklahoma
iw.
US
structlou aiveii to this act by tho nu-
thorltttts 'J Michigan In regard to tiio
taxation of land sold by ills United
Stliloa whothor putoiitod or not car-
rld out the Intention of tho law mak-
In power."
. .. ...
In tho onse of V liliorflpoon v. Dun-
can -1 Wall. 71 U. S. 310 18 L. B.1.
34. fli nfiiirt nnva- "ArUn.iuii
4e. the
r-v w-4. ...-..-Mi
buraiise these lnndH when taxed were I
owned by the United States In no
just aoiife ( an land be said to lilt
public lands after thev have been en-
tered at the land office and a certi-
ficate of cuti) obtained If public
lands bfore tbe eniiy after It they
ar pi I vile pnip"rl If subjeel to
h.' Ili kovi I nun lit la it power ti
n-vokt the ntl lll.l withhold tliu
paicut A .cumkI dle if the first
was authorized by law confers uo
right on tie buv i ami in a void act
oovounted to abstain lnm taxation CQUr8l( of ijuamosB In tho gonornl lamt
of tho nubile lond within ljer UniOa ()mca. It can Issue; nnd If the right
and Ui refrain from loglBlnUon that iff uut was In aboynnco during this
hnuld Impede the Federal Govern- time It would work n gruat hardship
ment in .UhpomIuk of thorn or Inter- to tbe stale; foi Uio puronasor as soon
fen- with the regulation of Congress as he Beta his certificate ot outry I
for the security of titles. It is dear! protected In hi proprietary Interest
th-" tlie Uivernment has not ben hln- ' Kssession and makq lasting
dered in sellliiK them nor Congress ul vslusble improvemantH. whlgh It
obstructed lu securln tlUes but It lx would lie dlUbult to separate from thu
claimed the coutnut has been violated !f;w"oUl for Ultt HH01 oi tX'
anyone suffering long with this disease for to
it is only necessary to take a few doses of
m iMirffisg
PRIG
West Oklahoma.
ed and delivered and thereafter Ui
laud coasos to be a Hurt ot the public
domain- rue government agrees to
miike proper conveyance ea soon as It
cn and In the nieantline holds tho
naked legal fo lu trust for tire pur
'chnsor. who has the equitable tlllo. As
i . .iimniiv fm nia
nrwddeiit U mwosHarlly happens that
y.tTjy. . .. i.. .. .
vpTirs BuuHb Distort iil inn reHuiar
lion
This queHtion was fully considered
b Hits court In Carroll v. Safford 3
Uo -I'iO and the views we have pre
seuted only realllrm the doctrines A
thai eaae
Hut it is Instated that tharo I J H
(lllfer.MHe between a oaan nnl a do-
nation entry that the ono maybo cpm-
11. i. whei the inonev is rwld. but th
oih. - ih nut peifectetl until It is cpy-
Mruiml by tbe general land offlge ain
- i . .
CoHtUmsd oa page 0.
Remedy
ES
4
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
The Guthrie Daily Leader. (Guthrie, Okla.), Vol. 31, No. 13, Ed. 1, Friday, May 29, 1908, newspaper, May 29, 1908; Guthrie, Oklahoma. (https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc77059/m1/3/: accessed May 10, 2024), The Gateway to Oklahoma History, https://gateway.okhistory.org; crediting Oklahoma Historical Society.