Tulsa Daily Legal News (Tulsa, Okla.), Vol. 29, No. 77, Ed. 1 Friday, April 2, 1926 Page: 6 of 6
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: Tulsa Daily Legal News and was provided to The Gateway to Oklahoma History by the Oklahoma Historical Society.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
PACE SIX
TULSA DAILY LEGAL NEWS
: DISTRICT COURT Numbers ending in 61 to 70 In-
clusive Divizion No S
- (Continued from Page One1 Numbers ending in 71 to 100 In
Storage et Trans Co (mo for new elusive DMsion No 4
trial) All divorce cases now on file or
) - : 23970-Okla Nati Bank v Nickle et which are hereafter filed are hereby
assigned to Division No 8
Monday April 26 3 Cases pending in one division
31982-Walker v Walker may be transferred to another oily'
Tuesday April 27 sion with the consent of the judge
' 25662-68-Ra)burn v Thomas (de- to which they are transferred and
'' ''-' ' Onion) any cue pending in the Family
Friday April 30 - Court may be transferred to the Dis
' -- 28670-Sanders v McGraw trict Court with the consent of the
- judge of the division to which same
' ' -
is transferred
DISTRICT COURT TRIAL I 4 Al! journal entries and orders - DOCKET I not contested except emergency or-
Division Luth No 4 I ders shall be presented to the judge
sue
er Jame J dg1 at the opening of court so as not to
' Saturday April 3 disturb the judge during the trial of
'' - ' 85197-Gulf Pipe Line Co V Co eases
-' - - - Trees (dem) No 5 The Court Cierk when
'' ! b -'' !' 85198-Gyp5y Oil Co v Co Trees receiving a plcading to be filed in a
- ' - - (dem) case in which the funds are ex
' :': ' 35200-Texas Co v Co Treu (dem) hausted shall before returning such
‘ :-" - 30775-Haskin v Schooley it al pleading to the person from whom
- (me) received have the minute clerk of
7 35078-Armour & Co v Smiley (mo the division in which said cause is
' - 34378-Boyd v Botkin (dem & me) pending present such pleading to
' P ' 33817-Green v Olda U Ry Co (mop the judge who will thereupon make
F ' - - 34683-General Explosives Co v the following order:
A i- Wilcox (dem) "The plaintiff in this case is 1
:' ' 34573-Richards v Chenault (me) hereby ordered to pay accrued
' l' - 35077-Jamison v Ird 0 & G Co et costs and to make an additional
'f: 1 al (mo) deposit of $5 within ten days
1 : ' 35176-Dodge v Tidal Oil Co (dem) from this date and the defend-
-
' - 35179-Paris v Sand Sprgs By Co ant is given until ten days after
-
1 ' -
- (me) such deposit is made in which to
: 31878-:Stamphill v St Louis & San file further pleadings"
4 1''' ' - Francisco Ry Co (dem) In the event such deposit is not
- - - - 15786-Turner v Shuler (mo) made then when such pleading or
34473-1st Nati Bank Bristow v another pleading is presented to the
-
i Johrson (mo) clerk for filing he shall before ref-
' 85173-Ark Val State Bank v Gra- turning came to the party from
- ham (dem) whom received present same to the
k L'- ' 34178-McCarthy v Okla Nat Gas judge who may order such cause
1:-" - - ' Co (dem) dismissed for failure to comply with
se - 1 38473-Pappin v Tulsa Storage & former order
' Traps Co (mo) No 6 The Court Clerk shall as
35374-Fisk v Stephens (mo) certain as per order heretofore
85395-King et al v Slemp et al made whether a case is a jury or
(dem) non-jury cause and shall prepare a
22998-City v Horvitz (m0) docket of jury cases and one of non30489-Strebel
et al v Emerson et jury rues tied at the end of each
al (no) month shall furnish the judge of
35177-Cosden Co v Gray et al each division of this court a type
(dem) written list of the jury and non-jury
: 21274-Lambert v Drum et al (mo) cases which remain undisposed of
34484-Hamel v Tague (mo) for the purpose of assisting the judge
r 35281-Bennett v Stairs (mo) of each division in setting his trial
)41 33295-Turnerv Turner et al docket of jury and non-jury cases
83580-81-Pomeroy v Allen
No 7 The judge of any divi-
(mo) sion regardless of the number of a
34487-Fidelity Inv Co v Hosey
case when the judge of the division
!
(appl for recr) Monday April 5 in which such case is pending ac
'
29380-McCloud v Brown-Dunkhi cording to its number is out of the
D G Co county or cannot be found may in
25292-Davis v Ward his discretion hear and determine
t 35579-Rhone v Williams any case in default or enter any
Tuesday April 6
order of dismissal or render judg-
24600 Crews v White et al merit or enter any order upon stip-
-
32885-Exchange Tr Co v Williams ulation of the parties
et al No 8 In the event any extra
ordinary remedy be asked such as
32983-Hixs n v Polston et al (seri
as to assets)
habeas corpus injunction receiver-
:
Wednesday April 7 ship mandamus etc and the judge
33991-Tulsa Vit Brick & Tile Co v of the division to which such case
Strong would be assigned according to its
20581-Brocklyn Oil & Gas Co v
number is not in the county or can-
Taylor et al not be found then the judge of any
29183-Jones v Hyer et al other division to whom the same may
35187-Adams v Ward et al be presented may hear such case
20096-cMAnnal1ey v Lane et al providing the relief sought ha! not
-
20097-MeAnralley v Lane et al been denied in another division or
Friday April 9 transfer the same to the proper divi-
sion in instances where the action
27679-Engeleman v Goldstant v
Hall is one which could legal!) be trans
Saturday April 10 ferred and heard by a judge other
30600-Lyons v Lyons (mo) than the one issuing the preliminary
Monday April 12 order or writ
84393-Lassar v Webb All other rules of the District
33387-Morris v Heyman Court are hereby revoked and set
Cr 3064-State v 011ie Platt (mo) aside
Cr 3073-State v Harry Bernard C S WALKER
(mo) Judge Division No 1
34395-Richards v Campbell EDWIN R McNEILL
32685-Crane Co v Sullivan et al Judge Division No 2
Wednesday April 14 Z I J HOLT
33876-Clay v Hall Judge Division No S
Thunday April IS LUTHER JAMES
33689-Walbridge-Aldin ger Co v Judge Division No 4
City et al i
33577-Pitts-Bateman Co v City state of Oklatiom(al"C8o9u)nty of Tulsa s 1
et al In Ihe Distriet Court ' !
Friday April 16 ANK
THE ARKANSAS VALLEY STATE I
B Plaintiff VR W 8 FEARS and I
34240-Rock v Williams et al BLANCHE FEARS et oh Defendants 1
35579-Rhone v Williams (restr or- N No 25257 E
OTI(E OF SHERIFF'S SATE t
der) Notice is hereby given that in 'plirsu- t
Monday April 19 thee Of an order of sale issued out Of I
the District Court of Tulsa County State c
31362-CuirmIngs v McFadden of Oklahnma on this the 29th 'day of 1
Tuesday April 30 March 1926 in an action wherein The c
Arkansas Valley State Bank was plain- c
34084-1-linkle et al v Cornelius et tiff and W S 'Fears and Blanche Fears 1
al et al were defendants same being Civil t
No 25257 directed to me the under- I
Wednesday April 21 signed Sheriff of Tulsa County Okla- 1
oltritasecnomntraneling me to levy upon ad- e
'- 25199-Ledbetter v Phoenix P &
h
subject owever to a t
Sup Co first mortgage lien 110W in full force and
Thursday April 22 effect coving said property in favor
of the Wes ertern and Southern Life In34398-Posker
v Emerson surance Company as assignee of the
Friay
d April 23 Exchange Trust Company of Tulsa Ok-
lahoma for the sum of 3800000 with
29284-Ryan v Prairie 0 & G Co accrued interest thereon since the 16th
Thursday April 29 day of August I920 all of the following
'o described real estate to-wit:
29983-Smith v Ward et al The East Half (F1 1-2) of the North- a
81896-Colbum v Ward east Quartcr (NE 1-4) and the 1-
t - Southwest Quarter (SW 4) of the A
A Northeast Quarter (NE 1-4) and the It
i RULES OF THE East Half (E 1-2) of the Northwest 1
'
Quarter (NW 1-4) of the Northeast d
Quarter (NE 1-4) and the East Half d
(E 12) of the West Half (W 1-2) 0
DISTRICT COURT of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1-0 C
of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1-4) 8
all in Section Thirty (30) Township li
: ----"' Eighteen (19) North Range Fourteen
tylimOrekloar-
Y: It is hereby ordered that the fol 1114)n a E el'atthaiinn i nTgullTO aCcort:sn
44 lowing be the rules of the District less
F f Court o Tulsa County Oklahoma tdoeceraettaff arrepenorfe '
f 'hne
I Pev:rnieon atilide $
effective from date hereof plaintiff The Arkansas Valley State
L' S Fears and
1 The District Court shall b Rant i
e iateh'eule'elfs ain4 SaVI defendants oh-
' composed of four divisions desig- tamed and made in said Court on the t
I! nated and presided over as follows: icIti1M9g 7teititurn7reds9t25ih! day of orrontheatsusiTt
Division No 1-C S Walker per cent from the lOt r
i n °February'
1925 anti paid and also the further
it Division N14 2-Edwin It Me
- sum of 91545 costs already accrued and 1
4 P Neill 950(0 the approximated accruing costs:
I the undersigned Sheriff of Tulsa
:4 Di vision No 3 and Family Court 4
t ounty Oklahoma will on the let day b
c
-Z I J Holt of May 19'20 at the hour of one o'clock ti
'f! Division No 4-Luther James I) tn of said day at the west front door g
of the County Court House of Tulsa a
Oklahoma In the CRY of Tulsa ti
1 no2 AP civil cases to be filed and County
w on file are hereby assigned to In slid Ccunty and State offer for sale d
and WI to the highest and best bidder p
tl the different divisions according to for cast in escribd hand r the said pmperty above ti
de o oo much thereof as will e
the District Court numbers borne by satiety said judgment together with the I)
I as provided th29th day of
therein d
4 Witness mY e d
such eases in the following manner Interest and costs hand this
e' to-wit: Match 1926
R D SANFORD tl
1 ' Numbers ending in 1 to 30 inclu-
sheriff of Tulsa County Oklahoma c
sive Division No 1 By CHAS PRICE Under-Sheriff
Numbers erding in 31 to 60 ir- (1 IAN 17 & SPRADLTICG
Attorney for Plaintiff
elusive DiVihit11 No 2 s-31-4-341---31da I
(10092)
State of Oklahoma County of Tulsa as!
In the District Court
M HUGHtS Ttustee CENTRAL SAV-
INGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION of Mae-
Mall Missouri a corporation Plain-
tiff vs CHAS K WARREN EFFIE
E IN ARREN and MARGARET CAS
TELAZ Defendant
No 35452
The State tat Oklahoma to Chas K War-
ren and Effie E Warren Defendants:
You will take notice that plaintiff M
Hughes Truetee for Central Sayings &
Loan Aesociation of Marshall Missouri
a corporation did on the lilth day of
March 1926 tile his petition in the Dis-
trict Court of Tulsa County State of
Oklahoma against the defendants Chas
IC Warren Effie E Warren and Mar-
garet Caste laz and that the defendanta
Chas K Warren and Effie In Warren
must answer said petition herein on or
before the llth day of May 1926 or said
petition will be taken as true and a
judgment rendered in said aetion against
the defendants Chas K Warren and
Effie E Warren for the sum of Three
Theueand Six Hundred Forty-one and
75100 Dollars ($364175) upon one prom-
issory rote executed by Chas K War-
ren and Effie E Warren on the 18th
day of June 1925 with intetest thereon
at the rate of 30 per cent per annum
from the 1st day of September 1925 and
for costs of suit including attorney's
fees in the sum of Three Hundred Sixty-
four and 17-100 Dollars ($36417) and a
further judgment in said action againet
said defendants Chas K Warren Effe
E Wairen and Margaret Caste lax for
the foreclosure of a certain Deed of
Trust securing said promissory note
upon the follow ing described premisee
to-wit!
Lot Twelve (12) Block Twelve (12)
Lying Place Addition to the City of
Tulsa Tulsa County Oklahoma ac-
cording to the recorded plat thereof
and adtueging that default has been
made n said Deed of Trust that plain-
tiff hag a fleet mortgage lien upon said
premises for the amount of which judg-
ment will be taken as aforesaid and or
dering that said premites be sold with-
pet appraisement and ordering that the 1
Proceeds be applied to the amount due
plaintiff snd the costs of this action and
forever barring and foreclosing said do
fendants from all right title estate or
interest or equity of redemption in or
to said premises
HAL TURNER
(Seal) Court Clerk
BY HUBERT A SMITH Deputy
F O CAVITT
Attorney f
for Plaintif
3-31-4-21-3w
(10069)
Stale of Oklahoma County of Tulsa-
In the District Court
T 71 BOSS Finintiff vs GEORGE F
NELSON and JEAN NELSON Defend-
ants NOTICE BY PUBLICATION
No 35540
The State of Oklahoma to George
Nelsen and Jean Nelson Greeting:
You and each of you will take notlee
that you have been sued by J H Bess
plaintiff in the above entitled cause in
the District Court of Tulsa County Ok-
lehoma and that you must answer the
Petition of said plaintiff on file ageing
you in the office of the Clerk of said
ftourt on or before the 7th day of May
1926 Gr the atlegallors of said petition
will be taken its true and a judgment
rendered against yet adjudging the
Plaintiff to have a first mortgage lien
upon the following described real estate
situated ir Tulsa County State of Okla-
homa to-wit
An undivided one-fourth interest in
Etnd to that certain tract lot or par-
cel of land described ai follows: Be-
ginning on the north line of the west
half of the northeast quarter of Sec-
tion 14 Township 19 North and
Range 12 East TUIFit County Okla-
homa 372 feet east of the northwest
corner thereof and running thence
south thirty degrees and five minutes
east a distance of 694 feet to the east
line of Enid west half of the northeast
quarter of Section 14 thence north
600 feet Ea the northeast corner of
said west half of the northeast quar-
ter of Secticn 14 thence west 343
feet to the piece of beginning cot-
taining two and three ninety-seven
thousandths acres more or less save
and except casement for a road or
public highway thirty feet in width
reserved by the grantor in deed of
November 23rd 1923 save and except
also right of way for eight-inch
pipe line over and across said
lands reserved by said grantor in said
deed of November 23rd
Subject to the balance due and unpaM
on one certain mortgage given to Wal-
ter S Clinton of Tulsa Oklahoma for
the sum of 3127560 bearing interest at
the Tate of eight per cent per P111111E11
from July 29 1923 due July 31 1924
For the sum of 9180000 with interest
thereon Vont the 31t day of October
192e at the rate of eight per cent untr
Paid together with the sum of 918000 at-
torney'm fees and the cost of said action
and foreclosing said mortgage and or-
dering said property sold to satisfy said
sum and forever barring you from any
right title equity or interest in or to
said real estate adverse to the rig-A
and title of tho purchaser at said sale
Witress my hand and the seal of said
Court this 25th day of March 1926
HAL TURNER
(Seal) Court Clerk
By HUBERT A SMITH Deputy
3-24-4-16-3w
(10020)
NOTICE OF SALE OF LANDS UNDER
EXECUTION
No 32565
Notice is hereby given that In pursu
ance of a writ of execution issued out
of the Clerk's office of the District Court
In and for Tulsa County Oklahoma on
the 5th day of March 1926 in an action
wherein State of Oklahoma ex rel O B
Mothersead Bank Commissioner was
plaintiff and James Bowen was defend
ant commanding me to levy upon the
property of James Bowen sufficient to
satisfy a judgment rendered In said ac-
tion In favor of the plaintiff State of
Oklahoma ex rel 0 B Mothersead
Bank Commiesioner and against the said
defendant James Bowen for the sum of
9218190 with interest thereon at the rate
of JO per cent per annum from the 3rd
day of February 1926 and fm- attornere
fee In the sum of 822319 and cot I
have levied upon oertaln property land
and tenements belonging to said James
Bowen and not exempt from sale under
execution for want of geode and chat-
tels of the said James Bowen to-wit:
The Southeast Quarter (SE 1-41 of
the Northwest Quarter (NW 1-41 of
Section Thirty-four (34) Township
Seventeen (17) Range Fourteen (14)
containing forty (40i acres in Tulsa
County State of Oklahoma
and have caused said lands and tene-
ments to be appraised according to law
at 8120000
Now therefote notice Is hereby given
that in pursuance of the command of
said writ I will offer for sale and sell
for cash to the highest bidder the above
described lands and premises on the 18th
day of April 1926 at 11110 o'clock 2) rn
of said day at the west front door of the
Court House In the City of Tulsa in
said County of Tulsa and State of Ok-
lahoma Dated this 10th day of Marc 1926
R D SANFORD
Sheriff of Tulsa County
By CHAS PRICE Under-Sheriff
18-4-12--31da
flOSSO)
BIlltICATION NOTICE
In the District Court of Tulsa Comity
State of Oklahoma
RICHARD B CRANE Plairtiff vs-
ANNA T CRANE Defendant
- No D-147
The Sinto of Oklahoma to the above
named Defendant:
You will take notice that you have
been sued in the above named Court by
the above plaintiff for a divorce on the
grounds of cruelty and that unlees von
answer tbe petition filed by this plain-
tiff in said Court on or before the rth
day of April 1926 said petition wilt be
taken es true and judgment granting' to
the plaintiff a divorce annulling can-
celling setting aside and holding for
naught the marriage contract with von
and for any other relief the Court may
seem necessary rendered according to
the prayer thereof
Witness my hand ard the seel of said
Court this 15t1 day of March lafit
HAL TURNER
(eal) Court Clerk
By PRANK MARKHAM Deputy
1-11-014--3w
--U
COURT u COMMON PLEAS
Division No 1— Division No 3—
FONT L ALLEN Judge GERALD F O'BRIEN Judge
Phone 22420 Phone 24072
Division No Division No 4--
ROBERT D HUDSON Judge SAUL A YAGER Judgo
Phone 22420 Phone 26072
EARL E LOGAN Court Clerk Telephone 3-6677
Three Terms of Court—First Monday is Marsh Juno and Novo Isor
Assignment Jags--
Fort L Allen
Judge Criminal Division
Gerald F O'Brien
00
NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS
It is hereby ordered that the
docket of Tuesday April 6th be and
the same is hereby passed to Wed
nesday April 7th 1926
FONT L ALLEN
Judge Court of Common Pleas
NEW CASES
6876—W H Stephenson v 3 L Parker
$25210 met W E Hudson atty
6877—Title Guar & Trust Co v B
M Grotkop $29535 wet Randolph
Haver & Shirk attys
6878—W A Howard v D C Matthews
$1000 on note J A Gill atty
NEW FILINGS
6086—Hall v Jacobs mo to vacate
Mgt
6399—Agey vMK&T Ry Co 'no
to make more def & cert
6706-07—Standard R & M Co v Yo-
ho affi pub
6538—S9u1mon v Dingman et al ma
for jdgt
6576—Maxwel v Hughes mo for
new trial
6865—Reed v Mid-West Chevrolet
Co same
6716—Hersogs Majestic Cloak Co v
Scidenbach 'no to subst party plff
4003—Williams v Army Legging Co
disml
6786—Standard R & M Co v Good
mo to make more def & cert
6306—Coleman v Sherry 'no to va
cote order
6550—M J Gloss & Co v Owens et
al
Tuesday April 20
6569—Thomason v Thompson
6576—Maxwell v Hughes
6585—Mar land Refining Co v Jack-
son et al
6586—Okla Scrap Material Co v
Float et al
6603—Phillips Fur Shop v Collins
Wednesday April 21
6633—Smith Grocery & Mkt v Stan-
field et al
6662—Weston v Petro et al
6672—Haney v Ben C Axley
6678—Minerva Henks v Ernest
Au Ils
6683—Linn & Spradling v McNeil
Thursday April 22
6831—Campbell v Hall
6715—Smith & Co v Seidenbachs
6716—Herzogs Majestic Cloak Co v
Seidenbachs
6787—McNulty jr et al v Fred
Monasco
6748—Buckle Printers Ink Co v
McCutchan
Friday April 23
6749—Duffey et al v Preston et al
6762—Intern Accounts Society
Vineyard
6763—Vacuum Oil Co v Freeman
6765—Grauer v Henshaw
6760—Noss v Louise Clipson
-----
COMMON PLEAS C-1:76-111T
MOTION DOCKET
Monday April S
disml
6788—Standard R & M Co v Good 5767—Stephen Ballard Co v Cline
6336--Haney v Weston et al
mo to make more def & cert
6306—Coleman v Sherry mo to va 6752—Atkinson v Perrott
6753—McMahan v National Hide &
cute order Fur Co et al
6571-0 K Machine & Mfg Co v
1 Robinson Tool Co
COMMON PLEAS COURT
1 CIVIL DOCKET 6317—Bell v Bird
1 6761—Walker v Miller et al
Monday April S 6713—Bebb v Warren et al
MO—I-atria v Simmons
6668—Halliburton Abbott Co v
Cline
5590—Intern Eup Co v Blankenbarg
6723—Spillman et al v Conyers adm
5595—Sterling 0 & G Co v Hi Marc
IILPUIP—owlutig X rnatsti et al
5646—O'Brien v Kimmel et al 6612—Westland Oil Co v Franks
6810—Andeel v Lauren et al
Wednesday April 7 6623—Meyer Kiser Corp v Selma-
6528—Parker v Gray et al terman
6533—Offenbacher Petr Co v Zelig- 6621—Hunt Battery Co v Boehler
son et al
6568—Edmister v Kahn et al 5950—Boss v England
6581—Bliss v Stevens et al 6677—Federal Trust Co v Farquhar-
6625—Sanders v Holland son
1144—Richards v Norris 6189—Spartan Pipe Co v R & E
6641—Thompson v Tulsa Paper Co supply Co
5763—Bass Furn Co v Rowley 5614—Martin v Tibbets & Pleasant
6186—Dieffenbach v Gillette et al et al
6269—Hindenach v Chastain at al 6561—White v Sullivan
6320--nrst Nati Bank v Sanders 6085—McCarty v Goodrich et al
6520—Flemming v Rogers 6452—Sanderson v Belt et al
Thursday April 8 6255—Clay v McNeil
5273—Hissont v Cranmer et al 6754—Evans v Davis
5462—Dickson v Caine ' 6708—Raymond v Gilmer
5513—Harvey v Norval & Dial 6305—Saddler v Johnson et al
5754—Holtgrewe Vombrock Earn 6781-0i Well Supply Co v Mason
Co v Stricken et al
5758—Harry May et al v Jones 6462—Electric Contracting Co v
Friday April 9 Cozzi et al
6036—Braniff v Tracy 6380—Tate v Seavers et al
6718—Meyer v Birkes et al 6392—Bass Furn Co v Chapman
6314—J S Marla Drug Co v Math- 6760—Price v Vick Oil Co
ews et al 5923—Letcher v Bohnefeld
6315—Barclay Paint Co v Deck 5998—Fox v Midland Valley Rwy
6359—Integrity Mut Ins Co v Co
Plumbers Supply Co 3825—Kays v Wooten
Monday April IL 5944—Rhone v Abbott
6454—Duke v Thornburg
6615—Jackson v Melton (1002)
m PUBLICATION NOTICE
6664—Street Eicholts Fu
Co V In the District Court of Tulsa County
Bickel! State of Oklahoma
H W MOORE Plaintiff vs HELEN'
6032—Bradford Rig & Reel Co v MOORE Defendant
' Lamb et al No D161
The State of Oklahoma to the above
3903—Wiser 011 Co v Conley named Defendant:
5160—Kramer et al v Gen Amen You will take notice that you have
been sued in the above named Court by
can Oil Co tbe above plaintiff for a divorce on the
Tuesday April 13 1926 grounds of desertion and abandonment
6007—Eastern Torpedo Co v Harter
and that tWIsltapalayinaili4taisvin esra I till ecg)ulltioonn
et al or before the Ilth day of May 1926 said
6017—Allerman v Blodgett petition will be taken as true and judg-
ment granting to the plaintiff a divorce
6501—Miller v Hubartt annulling cancelling setting aside and
6519—Bushow Lumber Co v Eno hwolittinfouforwtilititugeht rtehned 'Enrigriattceorcdoinntir to t
6574—Builders Supply Co v FPO the prayer thereof
Witness my hand and the seal of said
Lumber Ce Court this 29th day of March 1926
6770—Hardsman v Improved In- HAL TURNER
dustrial Order of Wiseman (Seal) Court Clerk
By C R PHILBRICK Deputy
6828—Panther Oil & Grease Co v E M CONNOR
Dowell Attorney for Plaintiff
3-304202w
Wednesday April 14
6575L--Farmer v Perry STATEMENT OP THE OWNERSHIP
6577—Jaeohson v Feldmam MANAGEMENT CIRCULATION ETC
REQUIRED EY THE ACT OF CON
6579—Hamilton v Johnson GRESS OF AUGUST 24 1912
of Tulsa Daily Legal News published
6587—Okla Scrop Material Co V dell) except Sunday and legal holidays
Plot et al
at Tulsa Oklahoma feurpnAutcloci if ilT Tulsa 2a as
6
6596—McNeal v Brownbtidge at al t' et e
Before n i
stsstoof Okel a notary
ahffinaCounty o for
Thursday April 15 the State and county aforesaid and
person
6598—Pardoe v Lee ally appeared Jennie C Rosen who hav-
ing been duly sworn according to law de-
6602—McCavley v Get Oil Co poses and says that she is the owner of
6607—Integrity Mutual Casualty Co the
the following Daay al
to thgebetewol?h'itrali that
-
v Kirkwood edge and belief a true statement of the
6617—Columbia Mills a eorp v gnglregistreinsaarda gpeuvinett icoinreol ar titohne date
Steckel shown in the above caption required by
6642—Martin v Holland the Act of August 24 1912 embodied in
section 443 Postal Laws and Regulations
6140—Alford v Standard Pay Co to-wit:
6138—Turner v Standard Pay Co t That the names and addresses of
the publisher editor managing editor
Friday April 16 and business managers are
6661—Brown v Jordan Publisher and Editor and Manager—
Jennie C Rosen Tulsa Oklahoma
6689—Davis v Hart Managing Editor—R L Beers Tulsa
6690—Turley' et al v Reeraink et al 15 That O slahat the owner is Jennie C Rosen
6691—Arrington v Philadelphia Fire Tulsa Oklahoma
Ins Co 3 That the known bondholders mort-
gagees and other security holders own
6695—King v Hart ing or holding 1 per cent or more of total
6696—Kemerlee v Hart amount of boods mortgages or other se-
Co tilities are None
6714—Moore v Henry H Gross s 4 That the average number of copies
6609—Nati Mfg Co v Stoney of each issue of this publication sold or
distributed through the mails or other
6817—Brents v Fiske wise to paid subscribers during the six
Monday April 19 months preceding the date shown above
Is 402
5712—Foote v Miller JENNTE CI ROSEN
6350—Fowler Pray et al Owner '
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
6508—Broken Arrow Lodge v Spur- 2nd day of April 1928
ELLA PATTON
lock (Seal) Notary Public
6505—First Nat Bank v Brooks tmy commission expires Feb 17 1929)
'FRIDAY APRIL 2 1921
RAILROAD TIME TABLE
ST LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO
MOVED TRAINS '
Train Arriving
No Time
1 Fiehm St Louis and Dalin 11:11 am
402 From Oklahoma City aad
Sapulv 1:00 ats
Front Kan City-St Louis 41:41 ans
1 Prom St Louis & MIMS° T sal
HI Prom Dallas-Ft Worth ?AI am -
tog From Wsynoks and Enid 1110 am
4 From Oklahoma City 1155
From St Louis I 00 pm
410 From Vernon and Enid N 5'10 pm
10 P'rom Oklahoma City 145 pm
117 Prom 1:55 pm
112 Prom Okla-home City 11:15 pm
426 From Holdenvills 1 :15 am
1 From Oklahoma City 11 :00 am
OSTROUND TRAINS
Train Daps:gag
No Tima
1 For Sapulpa and Okla CRY 1:111 am
118 For Joplin s :10 am
111 For Okla City and Dallas 1:50 am
For Oklahoma City 700 am
101 For Enid and Vernon 7:40 am
4 For Kamm City and 114
touts & Chicago 12'05 pm
8 For St touts & Memphis 1:00 pm
Co? For Enid end WaynokaN 215 pm
7 For Oklahoma City
Oltmulime and Ada 2:10 pm
10 For St Louis & Memphis— 118 pm
117 For Ft Worth & Dallas
112 For Kansas City 11:15 pm
425 For Moldenville 5:11 pm
41? For Okishoma City 1:05 pm
ATCHISON TOPEICA & SANTA FE
INBOUND TRAMS
Train Arriving
No Time
Ica From Names City Wichita
and Independence 7:10 am
202 Prom Kansan City sod In-
dependence 12:01 pm
201 From 'Cenral City sad In
dependence 5:11 Pm
iimmomema
°INBOUND TRAIN&
Train Departing
No MIL
102 To Indepordence and Kan
eas City ) 8 :Oa ant
110 To Independence and Kan-
n City 11:05 pm
804 To Independence Wichita
and Kaman City 11 96 pm
MISSOURI KANSAS & TEXAS
INBOUND TRAIN&
Train Arriving
No Time
123 From Dallas & Ft Worth loll am
24 From Oklahoma City 440 am
(Sleeper from Okla City)
ns Frem Muskogee 1125 am
111 From Oklahoma City 410 pm
227 From Dallas rt Worth 1:85 pm
221 From Dalin é FL Worth 1:15 am
OUTBOUND TRAINS
Train Departing
No Time
223 To 01 la City (aleePer oPoli
at 180 vm) 1 50 ant
224 To Dallas & Ft Worth 5 :06 sue
225 To Oklahoma City 1115 am
226 To Muskogee & McAlester 4:40 pm
221 To Muskogee Dallas Ft
Worth and South :31 pm
Subscribe for Daily Legal News
(10047)
In the District Court for Tulsa County
Oklahoma
SIEGMUND M SIEGEL Plaintiff vs
IRENE VIOLA SIEGEL Defendant
No 125
SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION
The State of Oklahoma to Irene Viola
Siegel Greetings:
Ycu will take notice that you have
beer sued in the above entitled Court in
said cause of action by the plaintiff
who has filed a petition in said action
asking for a divorce from you on the
grounds of desertion and you must ans-
wer the petition filed in said case on or
before the llth day of May 1920 or
plaintiff's petition will be taken as true
and judgment for divorce in his favor
and against you will be rendered
HAL TURNER
(Seel) Court Clerk
By CAL N CRUM Deputy
P A SOMPAYRAC
Attorney tor Plaintiff
3-30-4-20-3w
(10100)
In the District Coen of Tulsa County
State of Oklahoma
GEORGE a LANIER Plaintiff vs Et'-
OAR R WELCH ALETH A
WELCH HOME BUILDING & b()AN
ASSOCIATION FRANCES CHRIS
TIAN and A H CHRISTIAN Defend-
ants No 85228
NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF
LAND
Nalco is hereby given that in pursu-
ance of an order of sale issued out of
the District Court of Tulsa County Ok-
lahoma on the list day of March 1926
In an action wherein George D Lanier
was plaintiff and Edgar R Welch Ale-
tha L Welch Home Building & Loan
Association Frances Christian and A H
Christian were defendants directed to
me the undersigned Sheriff of Tulsa
County commanding me to levy upon
appraise and sell the following described
property
The North Ninety-five (95) feet of
Lots Thirteen (13) and Fourteen (10
of Block Nine (9) in Overlook Park
Addition to the City of Tulsa Okla-
homa according to the recorded plat
thereof
to satisfy a lodgment and decree of fore-
closure in favor of said plaintiff and
against said defendants obtained and
made in said Court on the list day of
March 1926 for the sum of Thirteen
Hundred Dollars ($130000) with intereat
thereon at eight (8) per cent from the
I ROI day of December 1924 One Hundred
Thirty Dollars ($13000) attorneys' fee
and costs accrued and accruing I wilt
on the 1st day of May 1926 at the hour
of 2:00 p m of said day at the West
i
door of the Court House n the City of
Tulsa in said County and State offer
for sale and sell to the highest bidder
for cash the said property above de-
scribed or so much thereof as will sat-
isfy said Judgment with interest and
costs said property to be sold subject to
a first mortgage in the principal sum of
Twenty-five Hundred Dollars (6250000)
owned and held by the Home Building t
Loan Association of Tulsa Oklahoma
Witness my hand this 31st day of
March 1926
R D SANFORD
Sheriff of Tulsa County
13y CHAS PRICE Under-Sheriff
4-1-4-30-30da
(I0101)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
In the County Court of Tulsa County
State of Oklahoma
In the Matter of the Estate of RICH-
ARD NEWMARK Deceased
Probate No 5919
All persons having claims against Rich-
ard Newmark deceased are required to
present the same with the necessary
vouchers to the undersigned administra-
trix at the office of DISNEY WHEEL-
ER 437-9 Kennedy Building Tulsa Ok-
lahoma within four months of the date
hereof or the same will be forever
Da rred
Dated this 1st day of April 1926
LACIE NEWMARK
Administratrig
DISNEY WHEELER
Attorneys for Administratrix
4- 1--4-16-2w
(10102)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
In the County Court of Tulsa County
State of Oklahoma
In the Matter of the Estate of CARO-
LINE DE NISE Deceased
Probate No 6005
All persons having claims against Car-
oline De Nise deceased are required to
'resent the game with the necessary
vouchets to the undersigned administra-
tor at The Central National Bank of
Tulsa Tulsa Oklahoma within four
months of the date hereof or the same
will be forever barred
Dated ehis let day of April 1926
THE CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF
TULSA
By W C RICHARDSON
Asst Trust Officer
Administrator
4-t--4-16--2W
---- -
aa'aaeea''s"e'sser-eseeee'eeaee----ee---ee-e----e'aeeeseeeeeeen----e'--e----ee---e--ee-e-eee--a-ae-e---- ------ - --- --L--4- - --144011111
f '
' ' ' - - ' ' ' n
-
- -
4 FRIDAY APRIL 2 1921
PAGE SIX ' ' i - - ' ' ' ' - ' TULSA DAILY LEGAL NEWS - ' - ' ' 4 ' - - '
y
4 ' '
' ' DISTRICT COURT Numbers ending In 61 to 70 In- (10092)
State of Oklahoma County of Tulsa es: - - ' - ' S LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCOI
RAILROAD TIME TAB
- ' LE -'
elusive Divizion No S In the District Court
t Tr g
t s - ' (Continued from Page One1
COURT 0 F COMMON PLEAS
T
Numbers ending in 71 to 100 in- M HUGHS mt CENTRAL SAV-
INGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION of Mae-
: a Storage de Trans Co (mo for new elusive DMsion No 4 Mali Mi OUD TRAIN
ssouri a corporation Plain- '
MNS ' -
- - trial) AU divorce cases now on file or tiff V CHAS K WARREN EFFIE I Train Arriving
: ' 28970-Okla Nati Bank v Nickle et which are hereafter filed are hereby
- i assigned to Division No 8 No '
GERALD F O'BRIEN Judge
'Y'bilAA ZRDefendanta
REN and MARGA 35452 RET CAS
The State of Oklahoma to Chas K war- Division No 1-
FONT L ALLEN Judge Division No 3-No Time
I
s Iriebm St Louie and Iopiin 11:1e am -
lel From Oklahoma City and
Sapulps
11 am
' - - Monday April 26 8 Cases pending in one division ren and Effie E Warren Defendants: i Phone 2-1420
' Phone 2-6072 III Front Kan City-St Louis 41 :00 :40 am
:
: 111982-Walker v Walker may be transferred to another die' You will take notice that plaintiff M uvismn No 2--- Division No 4-- 0 From St Louis & 01100110 7'00 am
Hughes Truetee for Central Sayings & ROBERT D HUDSON Judge SAUL A YAGER Judge HI Prom Dallas-8e Worth 1:30 ant -
Tuesday April 27 sion with the consent of the judge an Aesociation of Marshall Missour i fel From Waynoks and Enid a
nt
25662-68-Ra)burn v Thomas (de- to which they are transferred and a corporation did on the 18th day ot Phone 2-2420 Phone 2-6072 4 From Ok!aboms City 1141 ens
March 1926 file his petition in the Me- EARL E LOGAN Court Clerk Telephone 3-8577 7 From St Louie 100 pm
'' " - ' - - vision any case pending in the Family trict Court of Tulsa County State of 410 From Vernon and Enid N 6-60 Pia
Friday April 30 - Court may be transferred to the Dis Oklahoma against the defendants Chas Three Terms of Court-First Monday is Week June and Novesulter Is From Oklahoma Oty 606 pm
IC Warren Effie E Warren and Mar- '
judge o 117 larem KOMI City 0:56 pm
' '' 28670-Sanders v McGraw trict Court with the consent of the garet Castelaz and that the defendants e 12 Prom Okla-time City 1131 poi
- judf the division to which same (- K 'has K Warren and Effie E Warren n
Aignment jags- 6550-M J Glass & Co v Owen et 426 Prom Holdenville 1 AI sin must answer said petition herein on or
Froty ant
is transferred before the llth day of May 1926 or said Fort L Allen el I m Oklahoma Ci 11:00
- DISTRICT COURT TRIAL 4 Al! journal entries and orders petition will be taken as true and a Judee Cemin 1 D'' Tuesday April 20 01111101IND TRAIN& -
DOCKET
- ' - - ' I not contested except emergency or judgment rendered in said action against - -- -I -a I Ikaa"-
the defendants Chas K Warren and Gerald F O'Brien 6569 m
-Thoason v Thompson Train Departing
' Division No 4 Effie B Warren for the sum of Three 6576-Maxwell v Hughes NO Time
at er ames ge
''''' ' '' - ' - ' L h J J u d I dere shall be presented to the judge Thousand Six Hundred Forty-one and 1 For Sapulpa and Olds MY 1:811 am t
at the opening of court so as not to 75100 Dollars ($364175) uPon One prom NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS 6585-Mariand Refining Co v Jack- no For Joplin I :10 WO
' Saturday April 3 disturb the judge during the trial of riseson ryan t'diott?executed by Chas K War-
E Warren on the 18th It is hereby ordered that the son et al 111 For Okla City and Dallas I :50 am
9 For Oklahoma City 'MO am !7'' 85197-Gulf Pipe Line Co v Co eases day of June 1925 with intetest thereon docket of Tuesday April 6th be and 6586-Okla Scrap Material Co v see For Enid and Vernon 7:40 sin
:' -' - - Trees (dem) No 5 The Court Cierk when t -
- - he rate of 10 per cent per annum 4 For Kamm City and L ' -'
irfrom the let day of September 1925 and the same is hereby passed to Wed Plost et al Louts & Chicago 1114 pen
--' !: ''' ' ' 85198-Gypsy Oil Co v Co Tress receiving a plcading to be filed in a for costs of suit including attorney's uesday April 7th 1926 6603--Phillips Fur Shop v Collins 8 For St Louis & Memphis 100 pm
fees n
: - - (dem) case in which the funds are ex- I the sum of Three Hundred Sixt --
four
iand 17-100 Dollars 036417) and Ya FONT L ALLEN Wednesday April 21 CS? For Enid end WaynokaN I'll pm
7 For Oklahoma City
- 35200-Texas Co v Co Tress (dam) hausted shall before returning such further judgment in said action againet Judge Court of Common Pleas 6633-Smith Grocery & Mkt v Stan- oirmulese and Ada I:10 pm said defendants Chas K Warren Effie field et al to For St Louie & Memphis- 418 pm
' - - - - 80775--Haskin v Schooley at ai pleading to the person from whom E Watren and Margaret Casteli'tx for 117 For Ft Worth & Dallas Silli pi
- - ' -
- (me) received have the minute clerk of the foreclosure of a certain Deed of NEW CASES 6662-Weston v Petro et al 111 For Kansas City 11:85 pm
- ' -' - ' 85078-Armour & Co v Smiley (mo the division in which said cause is Trust securing said promissory note
upon ' the follow ing described premisee 6876-W II Stephenson v 5 L Parker 6672-Haney v Ben C Arley 426 For Holdenvill
417 For Oklahoma City 1:811 pm
7:05 pm
6678-Minerva Henks v Ernest
- i -1 - - 84878-Boyd v Botkin (dem & mo) pending present such pleading to to-wit! 825210 acct W E Hudson atty
Lot Twelve (12) Block Twelve (12)
- !T ' 33817-Green v Olda U Ry Co (mop the judge who will thereupon make Dying Place Addition to the City of 6877-Title Guar & Trust Co v B Aunt' ATCHISON TOPE1CA & SANTA FE
4 ' - -' 84683-General Explosives Co v the following order: Tulsa Tulsa County Oklahoma ac- M Grotkop 829535 acct Randolph McNeil INBOUND TRAINS
-
' " cording to the recorded plat thereof Thursday April 22 rrivi
' ' - I Wilcox (dem) "The plaintiff in this case Is and adjueging that default has V 6683-Linn & Spradling v McNe
been Haver & Shirk attys d Train A ng
No Time
6831-Campbell v Hall
- - 84573-Richards v Ohenault (me) hereby ordered to pay accrued made n said Deed of Trust that plain- 6878-W A Howard v D C Matthews 103 From Kansas City Wichita
tiff hag a fleet mortgage lien upon said
- - 85077-Jamison v It'd 0 & G Co at costs and to make an additional Premises for the amount of which Judie- $1000 on note J 6715-Smith & Co v Seidenbachs and Independenoe 7:30 am A Gill atty 09 Prom Minoan City and In-
1 - al (mo) deposit of $5 within ten days meat will be taken as aforesaid and or 6716---Hersogs Majestic Cloak Co v dependence 12:06 pm
dering that said premises be sold with- Sidenbacha tin Proty
1 ' - -- - 85176-Dodge v Tidal Oil Co (dem) from this date and the defend- ont apnraisemen t and ordering t e m Kanras Ci and In
hat the NEW FILINGS dependence 611 pin
-
-- s v an prgs 35179-Paris Sand S By Co ant is given until tell days after proceeds be applied to the amount due 6787-McNulty jr et al v Fred eammonona
r ' -- plaintiff end the costs of this action and 6066-Hall v Jacobs mo to vacate
''' 1 i - - (mo) such depoait is made in which to forever barring and foreclosing said do- 111 e 6748-Buckie Printers Ink Co v Train Departing
Monasco OUTBOUND TRAINS
:1 - :- 81878-:Stamphill v St Louis & San file further pleadings" fendants ' from all right title estate or Suav
interest or equity of redemption in or 6399-Agey' v M K & T By Co mo - - No Time
mcuutenan 102 To Independence and Kan-
(- e -: Francisco Ry Co (dem) In the event such deposit Is not to said premises to make more def & cert
- - - 15786--Turner v Shuler (mo) made then when such pleading or HAL TURNER
(Seal) Court Clerk Friday April 23 sag City ( I is am
- 84473-1st Nati Bank Bristow v another pleading is presented to the
Bv HUBERT A S
MITH Deputv 6706-Standard -Standard R & hi Co v Yo-
- ho affi pub 6749-Duffey et al v Preston et al 110 To Independence and Kam-
en 13:06 pm
Mr - I
'
v
4 Johrson (mo) clerk for filing he shall before re- F a cAtrrr 6762-Intern Accounts Society 1 804 To Independence Wichita
' - 85173-Ark Val State Bank v Gra- turning came to the party from r3tiorna f osrw Plaintiff 6538-Spulmon v Dingman et al ma
for jdgt Vineyard and Kenna City 1146 pm
' ' - ham (dem) whom received present same to the -- 6576-Maxwell v Hughes mo for 6763-Vacuum Oil Co v Freeman MISSOURI KANSAS & TEXAS
4
84173-McCarthy v Okla Nat Gas judge who may order such cause (10069) 6765-Grauer v Henshaw ternonND MAIM
11' - i' Co (dem) dismissed for failure to comply with In
the District Court 6865-Reed v Mid-West Chevrolet s le of °mamma County of Tulsa new trial et 6766-Noss v L pson ouise Cli 1vein Arriving
i vo ' ' No Time
io ' 83473-Pappin v Tulsa Storage & former order J it BOSS Plaintiff vs GEORGE F -------- 123 From Dallas & FL Worth 180 am
' Trans Co (mo) No 6 The Court Clerk shall as Co L
NELSON and JEAN NELSON Defend- same
! COMMON PLEAS COURT 14 From Oklahoma City 440 am
ants 6716-Herzogs Majestic Cloak Co v
85874-Fisk v Stephens (mo) (Sleeper from Okla City)
certain as per order heretofore NOTICE BY PUBLICATION MOTION DOCKET rts Frem Muskogee 1121 am
The State of Oklahoma to George 8 Seidenbach mo to subst party plff
4003-Williams v Army Legging Co - 116 From Oklahoma City 4:80 pro
tr7 From Dallas & Ft Worth- 1:85 pm
(dem) non-jury cause and shall prepare a Nelson ane Sean Nelson Greeting: Monday April 5 129 From Mime é Ft Worth 711 am
' not
tee ' 22998-City v Horvitz (mo) docket of jury cases and one of non- You and each of you will take n tee disml
5767-Stephen Ballard Co v Cline -
80489-Strebel et al v Emerson et jury cases atql at the end of each that you in been sued by J H Boss
1n
plaintiff in the above entitled cause 6786-Standard R & DI Co v Good
6386--Haney v Weston et al OUTBOUND TRAINS
Train Departing
al (nut) month shall furnish the judge of the District Court of Tulsa County
Olt M0 to make more def & cert
6752-Atkinson v Perrott No Time
85177-Cosden Co v Gray et al lehoma and that you must answer the
each division of this court a type f id plaintiff fil 1 s
Petition o 9a on e aga n 6306-Coleman v Sherry mo to va
6753-McMahan v National Hide & 223 To Ma City (sleeper open
(dem) written list of the jury and non-jury You In the office of the Clerk of eate order
said -- Fur Co et al at 9:80 vm)
224 To Dallas & Ft Worth 1:30 am
506 am
' faiurt on or before the 7th
day of May 1136 am
81274-Lambert v Drum et al (mo) i
cases which remain undsposeu or 1926 Gr the atlegatiors of said petition 6571-0 K Machine & Mfg Co v 1123: I: firuslahooma City
k gee tit McAlester 4 :40 pm
z' th
84484-Hamel v Tague (mo) for e purpose of assisting the judge will be taken as true and a judgment '-
COMMON PLEAS COURT 1 Robinson Tool Co 221 To Muskogee Dallas Ft
35281-Bennett v Stairs (m tr
o) of each division in setting his ial rendered against roe adjudging the
Plaintiff to have a first mortgage lien i CIVIL DOCKET 6317-Bell v Bird Worth and South
- :30 pm
I 83295-Turnerv Turner docket of jury and non-jury cases upon the following described real estate 1 6761-Walker v Miller et al
83580-81-Pomeroy v Allen et al ituated in Tula
e County State of Okla- ' Subscribe
No 7 The udge of an divi-
j y rime towit Monday April S
6713-Bebb v Warren et al for Daily Legal News
: (mo) An undivided one-fourth interest in 6668-Halliburton Abbott Co v
34487-Fidelity Inv Co v Hosey Si on t regardless A ss of the number of a Etnd to that certain tract lot or par- 655 atrick v Simmons
0-t- Cline (10047)
case when the judge of the division eel of land detcribed rie follows: Be- 5590-Intern Sup Co v Blankenbarg ' Tn the District Court for Tulsa County
(appl for recr) inning on the north line of the west
half of the northeast quarter o ec- - 6723-Spillman et al v Conyers adm Oklahoma
Monday April S in which such cam is pending ac g r s 5595 Sterling 0 & G Co v Hilliard
et al SIEGMUND M SIEGEL Plaintiff vs
's 29380 McCloud v Brown-Dunichl cording to its number is out of the tion 14 Toweship 19 North and 5646-O'Brien v Kimmel et al IRENE VIOLA SIEGEL Defendant
' D G Co county or cannot be found may in Range 12 East TUIFit County Okla-
homa 372 feet east o the nor wes
f northwest 6810-Andeel v Lauren et Oil Co v Franks
et al No 125
SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION
Oklahoma to Irene Viola
- 25292-Davis v Ward his discretion hear and determine corner thereof and running thence Wednesday April 7 6623-Meyer Kiser Corp v Schus- Siegel Greetings:
The State of O
' 35579-Rhone v Williams any case in default or enter any south thirty degrees and five minutes
east a distance of 694 feet to the cart 6528-Parker v Gray et al terman Yeti will take notice that you have
s - order of dismissal or render judg- rine of Said west half of the northeast 6583-Offenbucher Petr Co v Zell- beer sued in the above entitled Court in
Tuesday April 6 ' 6621-Hunt Battery Co v Boehler said cause of action by the plaintiff
' 14 thence north
ann who has filed a petition in said action
24600-Crews v White et al merit or enter any order upon stip- quarter of Section
600 feet ta the northeast corner of et al
ulation of the parties said west half of the northeast qua?- 6568-Edmister v Kahn et al asking for a divorce from you on the
32885-Exchange Tr Co v Williams 5950-Boss v England grounds of desertion and you must am-
No 8 In the event any extra- ter of Secticn 14 thence west 848
6581--Bliss v Stevens et al ition filed in said case on or
et al feet to the piece of beginning cm- 6677-Federal Trust Co v Farquhar- Iv
before pe thet llth day of May 1926 or
'
'' 32983-Hixscn v Polston et al (sirs ordinary remedy be asked such as taining two and three ninety-seven 6625-Sanders v Holland son plaintiff's petition will be taken as true
habeas corpus injunction receiver- thousandthe acres more or less save 1144-Richards v Norris and Judgment for divorce in his favor
as to assets) and except casement for a road or 6189-Spartan Pipe Co v R & E
and against you will be rendered
Wednesday April 7 ship mandamus etc and the judge public highway thirty feet in width 6641-Thompson v Tulsa Paper Co Supply Co HAL TURNER
83991-Tulsa Vit Brick & Tile Co v of the division to which such case reserved by the grantor in deed of Klee
November 23rd 1923 save and except 4"-atpan Fern Co v Rowley 5614-Martin v Tibbets & Pleasant (Seel) Court Clerk
Strong would be assigned according to its also right of way for eight-inch 6186-Dieffenbach v Gillette et al et al P A SOMPAYRAC
By CAL N CHUM Deputy
20581-Brocklyn Oil & Gas Co v number ber is n
not in the county or can- P pt line over and across said V-
minas reserved by said grantor in said 69-Hindenach v Chastain at al 6561-White v Sullivan Attorney tor Plaintiff
Taylor et al not be found then the judge of any deed of November 23rd 6320-First Nati Bank v Sanders 6085-McCarty v Goodrich et al
3-30-4-20-3w
29183--Jones v Hyer et al other division to whom the same may
aub unite
'' on to the balance due and un''
n one certain mortgage given to Wal- 6520-Flemming v Rogers 6452-Sanderson v Belt et al (mom
11e -
85187-Adams v Ward et al be presented may hear such case ter S Clinton of Tulsa Oklahoma for Thursday April 8 6255-Clay v McNeil In the District Coart of Tulsa County
20096-cMAnnalley v Lane et al providing the relief sought has not the sum of $12 75 60 bearin at 9
t g interest te 578-H m lsso v Cranmer et al- 6754-Evans v Davis State of Oklahoma
i GEORGE a LANIER Plaintiff vs Et'-
' 20097-McAnnalley v Lane et al been denied in another division or the rate of eight per cen per smut
from July If 1923 due July 81 1924 5462--Dickson v Mins ' 6708-Raymond v Gilmer I OAR R WELCH ALETHA L
Friday Aprit 9 transfer the same to the proper divi- For the sum of 9180000 with interest ASSOCIATION FRANCES CHRIS
5513-Harvey v Norval & Dial 6305-Saddler v Johnson et al WELCH HOME BUILDING A LOAN
thereon teem the 31et day of October
27672-Engeleman v Goldstant v on
st in instances where the action len at the rate of eight per cent unth 5754-Holtgrewe Vombrock RUM 6781-0i Well Supply Co v Mason TIAN and A H CHRISTIAN Defend-
Hall is one which could legal') be trans- Paid together with the sum of $18000 at- Co v Stricken et al ants
No 85228
Saturday April 10 ferred and heard b
Y a j u d
ge other torney's fees arid the cost of said acting M J
and foreclosing said mortgage and or 5758-Harry May at al v ortee 6462-Electric Contracting Co v NOTICE or SHERIFF'S SALE OF
30600-Lyons v Lyons (mo) than the one Issuing the preliminary dering said property sold to satisfy said Friday April 9 Cozzi at al LAND
Nalco is hereby given that in pursu-
Monday April 12 order or writ sum and forever barring you from any
right title &pay or interest in or to 6036-Braniff v Tracy 6380-Tate v Seavers et al once of an order of sale issued out of
84393-Lassar v Webb All other rules of the District raid real estate adverse to the rtgat 6718-Meyer v Birkes et al 6392-Bass Furn Co v Chapman lahoma on
the gist day of March 1926
the District Court of Tulsa County (-
33387-Morris v Heyman Court are hereby revoked and set and tiVe et the purchaser at said sale
Witrees my hand and the seal of said 6314-J S Marin Drug Co v Math- 6760-Price v Vick Oil Co in an action wherein George D Lanier
Cr 3064-State v 011ie Platt (mo) aside Court this 25th day of March 1926 ews et al 5923-Letcher v Bohnefeld was plaintiff and Edgar R Welch Ale-
tha L Welch Home Building & Loan
Cr 3078-State v Harry Bernard C S WALKER (Seal) HAL TURNER
Court Clerk 6315-Barclay Paint Co v Deck 5998-Fox v Midland Valley Rwy Asociation Francee Christian and A H
Christian were defendants directed to
(MO) Judge Division No 1 By RUPERT A SMITH Deputy 6359-Integrity Mut Ins Co v Co me the undersigned Sheriff of Tulsa
84395-Richards v Campbell EDWIN R McNEILL '-'4-416-8w Plumbers Supply Co 3825-Kays v Wooten County commanding me to levy upon
--Crane Co v Sullivan at al Judge Division No 2 - appraise and sell the following described
32685
Monday April 12 5944-Rhone v Abbott
(10020) property:
Wednesday April 14 Z I J HOLT NOTICE OF SALE OF LANDS UNDER 6454-Duke v Thornburg The North Ninety-five (95) feet of
33876-Clay v Hall Judge Division No S E NECUTION
No 82565 6615-Jackson v Melton (1002)
Lots Thirteen (13) and Fourteen (10
PUBLICATION NOTICE
of Block Nine (9) in Overlook Park
Thursday April IS LUTHER JAMES Notice is hereby given that in pursu 6664-Street Eicholtz Fum Co v In the District Court of Tulsa County Addition to the City of Tulsa Okla33689-Walbridge-Aldinger
Co v Judge Division NA ance of a writ of execution issued out Bickel! State of Oklahoma home according to the recorded plat
-o a of the Clerk's office of the District Court H v W MOORE Plaintiff vs HEL
- thereqt
City et al ----------- in and for Tulsa County Oklahoma on 6032-Bradford Rig & Reel Co v MOORE Defendant to satisTy a jadgment and decree of fore33577-Pitts-Bateman
Co v City s tat (10089) the litit day of March 1926 in an action Lamb at al No D-161 closure in favor of said plaintiff and
e of nklelioma County of Tulsa ' ' se wherein State of Oklahoma ex rel O B -- The State of Oklahoma to the above against said defendants obtained and
et al In The District Court Mothen5ead Bank Commissioner was daild-wiser Oil Co v Conley named Defendant: m list in said Court on the 81 t day of
Friday April 16 A RI A NSA S VALLEY STATE plaintiff and James Bowen was defend- 5160-Kramer et al v Gen Amen- You will take notic that you have - M"
THE arch 1926 for the sum of Thirteen
e
BANK Plaintiff vs W S FEARS and ant commanding me to levy upon the been sued in the above named Court by h t i
Hundred Dollars 0130000) with intereat
C E
34840-Rock v Williams et al BLANCHE FEARS et al Defendants Property of James Bowen sufficient to can Oil Co the above plaintiff for a divorce on the thereon
day of December a eight ht (8) per cent from the
35579-Rhone v Williams (restr or- No No 25'257 satisfy a judgm lient rendered in said ac- Tuesday April 13 1926 grounds of desertion and abandonment Thirty s 6
924 One Hundred
Tlf E OF SHERIFF'S SALE tion in favor of the plaintiff State of and that unless you answer the petition 1 ni t D o 11 a r (W
O 00) attorneys' fee
der) Notice le hereby given that in pursu- Oklahoma ex rel O B Mothersead 6007-Eastern Torpedo Co v Harter filed by this plaintiff in said Court on and costs accrued and accruing I will
Monday April 19 thee of an order of sale issued out of Bank Commissioner and against the said et al or before the Ilth day of May 1926 said ell attorne th:olet day of May 1926 at the hour
the District Court of Tulsa County State defendant James Bowen for the sum of petition will be taken as true and Pete- DI of said day at the West
31362-CummIngs v McFadden of Oklahema on this the 29th ' day of $218190 with Interest thereon at the rate 6017-allerman v Blodgett door of rhe Court House in the City of
mein granting to the plaintiff a divorce
March r Tulsa in said County and State offer
Tuesday April 30 y State Bank was plain- 19-6 in an action wherein The of 10 per cent per annum from the 3rd 6501-Miller v Hubartt annulling cancelling eetting aside and
Arkansas Valley day f Fee or re
34084- for sale and sell to the highest 'bidder
Hinkle et al v Cornelius et tiff and W S Fears and Blanche Fears fee in thee rauaamr y 1926 and fof 822319 and costs I 6519-Bushow Lumber Co v Eno holding for:EN:tight the marriage eceenntraet
for cash the said property above de-
al 'r A-t Supply Co Le ell wh e rendered "Cann g 'a scribed or so much thereof as will sat-
I
et al were defendants same being Civil have levied upon oertain property land 6d ii4-ouliviers cupply sv rP0 the prayer thereof
No -0 WY said Judgment with interest and
20-57 directed to me the under- and tenements belonging to said James
' Witness my hand and the seal of said
costs said property to be sold subject to
Wednesday April 21 signed Sheriff of Tulsa County Okla- Bowen and not exempt from sale under Lumber Co Court this 29th day of March 1926
- -
35199-Ledbetter v Phoenix P & theorma commanding me to levy upon ad- 1 execution for want of geode and chat- 6770-Hardsman v Improved In- HAL TURNER a first mertgage in the principal sum of
tise and sell subject however to a i Twenty-five Hundred Dollars ($2500001
Sup Co first mortgage lien n The Southeast Quarter (SE in full force and tels of the said James Bowen 1 to-wit: of dustrial Order of Wiseman (Seal) Court Clerk owned and held by the Home Building
Thursday April 22 effect covering said property in favor
of the Western and Southern Life In- -
the Northwest Quarter (NW 14) of 6828-Panther Oil & Grease Co v E M CONNOR
By C R PHILBRICK Deputy r
L n Association of Tulsa Oklahoma
Witness my hand this list day of A
34398-Posker v Emerson surance Company as assignee of the Section Thirty-four (34) TOWoRMO Attorney for Plaintiff March 1926
Friday April 23 Exchange Trust Company of Tulsa Ok- Seventeen (17) Range Fourteen Dowel! n (14) D8-30-4-20-8w R D SANFORD
containing forty (40t acres in Tulsa Wednesday April 14
lahoma for the sum of $800000 with Sheriff of Tulsa County
29284-Ryan v Prairie 0 & G Co accrued interest thereon since the 16th County State of Oklahoma ss5--n rmer v Perry' y STATEMENT OP THE OWNERSHIP By CHAS PRICE Under-Sheriff
and have caused said lands and tene no I
Thursday April 29 day of August WO all of the following MANAGEMENT CIRCULATION ETC 4-1-4-30-30da-
ments to be appraised according to law 6577-Jacobson v Feldmam
'I deseribed real estate to-wit:
' REQUIRED HY THE ACT OF CON-
29983-Smith v Ward at al The East Half (E 1-2) of the North- at 8120000 n 6579-Hamilton v Johnson CRESS OF AUGUST 24 1912
published
82896-Colbum v Ward east Quarter (NE 1-4) and the Now therefote notice is hereby give (10101)
I
r Southwest Quarter (SW 1-4he at in pursuance of the command of 6527-Okla Scrop Material Co v d il of Tulsa Daily Legal News NOTICE TO CREDITORS
Sunday d ' publ '
a e except -un ay an legal holidays In the County Court of Tulsa County
A ' -ea ) of t that Northeast Quarter (NE 1-4) and the said writ I will offer for sale and sell Plost et al at Tulsa Oklahoma for April 1 1926
East Half (E 1-2) of the Northwest for cash to the highest bidder the above State of Oklahoma
t RULES OF THE Before me a notary public in and for ARD NEWMARK Deceased
Quarter (NW I-41 of the Northeast described lands and premises Ott the 18th 6596-McNeal v Brownbtidge et al Stateeoof Oklahoma County of Tulsa s'S In the Matter of the Estate of RICH-
re
"' Quarter (NE 1-4) and the East Half day of April 11196 at 11110 o'clock p nt Thursday April IS the State and county aforesaid person-
' (le 1-21 of the West Half (W 1-2) of said day at the west front door of the Probate No 5919
A' DISTRICT COURT of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1-4) Court House in the City of Tulsa in 6598-Pardoe v Lee ally appeared Jennie C Rosen who hay- All persons having claims against Rich-
log been duly sworn according to law de- ard Newmark deceased are required to
!i'l of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1-4) said County of Tulsa and State of Olt 6602-McCauley v Get 011 Co poses and says that she is the owner of present the same with the necessary
)' ----"'' all in Section Thirty (30) Township lahoma
Eighteen (18) North Range Fourteen Dated this 10th day of Maeda 1926 6607-Integrity Mutual Casualty Co the 'Puma Daily Legal News and that vouchers to the undersigned administra-
the following is to the best of her knowl-
) East in Tulsa Countv Okla- R D SAIMORD trix at the office of DISNEY at WHEEL-
v Kirkwood edge and belief a true statement of the
It is hereby ordered that the fol- alma containing 150
acres 'more or Sheriff of Tulsa County- ER 437-9 Kennedy Building Tulsa Ok-
$ lowing be the rules of the District less By C1AS PRICE Under-Sheriff 6617-Columbia Mills a eorp ownersiiip management circulation etc
lahema
of the aforesaid publication for the date hereof or the same will be forever
within four months of the date
F Court of Tulsa County Oklahoma tdoensraatisfy a Ted pay off the judgment and g gg4
P of t recloure in favor of the -- -12-31 a Steckel shown in the above capticn required by Da rred
effective from date hereof plaintiff The Argleansas Valley State 6642-Martin v Holland the Act of August 24 1912 embodied in Dated this let day of April 19'26
(IMO) section 443
ia Bane and against W S Fears and Postal Laws and Regulations LACIE NEWMARK
e le The District Court shall be PFBLICATION NOTICE 6140-Alford v Standard Pay Co to-wit:
Blanche Fears et al defendants oh- Administratrix
'A composed of four divisions desig- tamed and made in said Court on the In the District Court of Tulsa County 6138-Turner v Standard Pay Co Oil' Tahbeitantehre names amnadn aadidnress:s not DISNEY & WHEELER
11 sated and presided over as follovm: 10th day of Febtuary 19'25 for the sum State of Oklahoma
of $11499 °
90 with interest thereon at six RICHARD B CRANE - Plait:Aft vs Friday April 16 and business managers are g g dit r Attorneys for Administratrix
4-I-4-16-2w
al Division No 1-C S Walker per cent from the 10th day of February ANNA T CRANE Defendant 6661-Brown v Jordan Publisher and Editor and Manager- -------
1925 unti paid and also the further - No D-97 Jennie C Rosen Tulsa Oklahoma
'5 Division No 2-Edwin R Me- sum' of $1545 costs already accrued and The State of Oklahoma to the above 6689-Davis v Hart Managing Editor-R L Beers Tulsa (10102)
4 Neill 250(4) the approximated accruing Costs: named Defendant: 6690-Turley' et al v Reeraink et al Oklahoma NOTICE TO CREDITORS
2 That the owner is Jennie C Rosen In the County Court of Tulsa County
Division No 3 and Family Court I C the undersigned Sheriff of Tulsa You will take notice that you have
ouety Oklahoma will on the lit day been sued in she above named Court by 6691-Arrington v Philadelphia Fire Tulsa Oklahoma State of Oklahoma
se -Z I J Holt of May 1926 at the hour of one o'clock the abcve plaintiff for a divorce on the Ins Co
4 3 That the known bondholders meat- In the Matter of the Estate of CARO-
! i N 4-Luther James' 12 in of sale day at the west front door grounds of cruelty and that unlace von
Division o -
of the County day House of Tulsa answer the petition filed by this plain- 6695-King v Hart gagees and other security holders own- LINE DE NISE Deceased
ing or holding I per cent or more of total Probate No 6005 t
'
1
2 All civil cases to be filed and
now on file are hereby assigned to County Oklahoma in the City of Tulsa tiff in said Court on or before the rut
in said Ccunty and State offer for sale day of April 1926 said petition wilt be
a Co sell to the highest and best bidder taken es true and judgment granting to 6696-Xemeriee v Hart amount of bonds mortgages or other se- All persons haying claims against Car-
"entities are: None
ge number of copies
6714-Moore v Henry H Gross 4 That the average °line De Nise deceased are required to
present tie same with the necessary
' '
it the different divisions according to for cash in hand the said property above the plaintiff a divorce annulling win-
described or en much thereof as will ceiling setting aside and holding for 6809-Natt Mfg Co v Stoney of each issue of this publication &aid or vouchers to the undersigned administra-
dietributed through the mails or other- tor at The Central National Bank of
the District Court numbers borne by satiety said judgment together with the naught the marriage contract with von 6817-Brents v Fiske wise to paid subscribers during the six Tulsa Tulsa Oklahoma within four
such cases in the following manner interest and costs as provided '--
I! April 19 months preceding the date shown above months of the date hereof or the same
ided therein
11 3 other relief the Court may
Monday
Witness soy hand this the 29th d ay and for an or deem necessary rendered according to Numbers erding in 81 to 60 ir- Te is 402 will be forever barred
'
' to-wit: Match 1928
R D SANFORD the prayer thereof 5712-Foote v Miller JENNTE CI Own ROSEN er 11-IE CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF
Dated Otis let day of April 1926
:
t Numbers ending in 1 to 30 inclu-
Sheriff of Tulsa County Oklahoma Witness me hand and the see! of said
Court this 15th day' of March 1916 6350-Fowler Pray at al
Sworn to and subscribed before me Ole TULSA
15 sive Division No 1 By CHAP PRICE Under-Sheriff HAL TURNER 6508-Broken Arrow Lodge v Spur W
2nd day of April 1928 By W C RICHARDSON
ht -
yi SPRADLING (Seal) Court Clerk lock ELLA PATTON Asst Trust Officer
i: t !
Attorneys for Plaintiff By PRANK MARKHAM Deputy (Seal) Notary Public Admintetrator
elusive Division No 2 8-31-4-4-31de 1-11-44-3w 6505-First Nat Bank v Brooks tatty commission expires Feb 17 1929) 4-9-4-18-2w
'
-
-
t
:-
i ' t -
-
' - -
- :a -
-
-
t
- --
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View five places within this issue that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
Rosen, Jennie C. Tulsa Daily Legal News (Tulsa, Okla.), Vol. 29, No. 77, Ed. 1 Friday, April 2, 1926, newspaper, April 2, 1926; (https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc2131790/m1/6/?q=j+w+gardner: accessed July 18, 2024), The Gateway to Oklahoma History, https://gateway.okhistory.org; crediting Oklahoma Historical Society.