The Daily Legal News (Oklahoma City, Okla.), Vol. 13, No. 10, Ed. 1 Wednesday, September 13, 1916 Page: 1 of 4
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: Oklahoma Digital Newspaper Program and was provided to The Gateway to Oklahoma History by the Oklahoma Historical Society.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
LAW
RIAL ESTATE
BUILDING
•++++++++++++'
THE DAILY LEGAL NEWS
+♦++*+♦++♦♦♦'
FINANCIAL AND
GENERAL
INTELLIGENCE
i + + + 4i + + + + + + + + +
VOLUME 13.
OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA. WEDNESDAY EVENING SEPTEMBER 13, 1S1C
NUMBER 10
DISTRICT COURT
GEO. W. CLARK..............Judge
JOHN W. HAY80N............Judge
EDWARD D. OLDFIELD......Judge
JAMES BEATY .........Court Clerk
t
DISTRICT COURT PHONES:
Judge Clark ............Walnut 6317
Judge Hayson ..........Walnut 3148
Judge Oldfield ..........Walnut 3916
District Clerk...........Walnut 6616
NE'.V CASES.
20131— Monnie B McCall v Wm I
McCall Divorce Ans - Shirk &
Danner plffe attys.
20132— Carl E Berggern et al v
Thure Carlson et al Note 82000 A
frcl L 1 to 8 incl 41 to 48 incl B 28
Millers Bird Ans 10-13 Ames Chamto
ers 'Lowe & Richardson plffs attys.
20133— State ex rel v P W Wtns-
lett et al.
20134—Katherine L Smith v Joa
eph P Smith Divorce Ans 10-21 John
H Halley plffs atty.
20135—Docie Brown v J E W.
Brown. Divorce Ans 10-5 A J Taft
plffs atty.
PLEADINGS.
19991—Hickey v Dyking Ans.
20025—Kendrick v Ft S & W et
al Amd pet.
20014—Higdon v Higdon Ans.
19626—Peyton v Fields et al Ans
of Cdn ad lit.
19514—Inter St Mtge Tr Co v
Chenoweth et al Same
MOTIONS AND FILINGS.
1604—Truster v Truster To strike
13537—Boddein v Harrah St Bk.
Aft for garn.
18425—Lusk et al v McClure Cert
of app.
20075—Aetna B ft L Assn v" Moss
et al Mo & appl for appt of rec
13495—Wulfemeier v Peck et al.
Dis.
14690—Cunningham v Kahle Stip.
20127—Peeler v Peeler Aff of mall
13767'—Jones v Owens et al To
retax costs
20058—Grimm v Grimm To strike
20052—Same v Same Cit.
19376—St Clair v Vinsant et al.
' -Pet for inter.
18372—Hemmingway v Callahan.
New tr.
JUDGMENT ENTRY
10795—State Life Ins Co v Epw
TTniv et al (6)
17508—Allen v Allen
19601—Hutsell v Dunjee et al
14690—Cunningham v Kahle
20075—Aetna B & L Assn v Moss
et al
17551—Lissauer v Muller et al
SUMMONS.
19964—Roberts"""v~Ft S & W C E
Varner agt per; C L Mills not f.
LIEN
PROCEEDINGS.
By Judge Clark.
Uv rnafir’m
PV J-l-"* WlVBPR.
•• — a—r-—rn r Fskl-? TVs.
r- --- *•
17567—Bk of Jones v Pattle Strlk
from 9-16 pend settle to be reset
ASSIGNMENTS.
19535—Botts » Storm et al
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 14
17895—State v Reed et al.
18695—Gregory Sawyer
18722—Griswold v Meyers
18745—Meadows v Turner
FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 15
15294—My-rs v Okla City
19666—Porterfield v Billings et al
17648—Cottingham v S Fe
17988—'Holden v Crain
19023—Mitchell v A T * S F Ry.
19292—Bailey ▼ Naden
19482—Woodworth v Woodworth
19489—Estabrook v Carnahan
16884—Stand S & L v Young et al
SATURDAY SEPTEMBER 16
17586—Rumrill v Hill etal
18743—Andrews v Childers et al
18755—Ashley v (Seorge et al
18896—Williams v McKinley et al
. 18475—Jones v Owens
18995—Sites v Pruitt et al
18990—Bledsoe.v Bledsoe
19227—Johnston v Johnston
19952—‘Yoder v Marinello Beauty
8bop.
--Cupp v Baker.
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 18
17898—Okla Oper Co v Skirvin Oper
Co.
18905—Johnson et al v Dawson
19069—Young r Skirvin et al
19143—Cox v Mabry Motor Exch.
19303—Sperry et al s Francis
19321—Soper ▼ Stone et al
19353—Mitchell v Randall
19359—Jones v Cushman
19362—Bowen v Ikard
19529—Witchita Mill * E On ▼
Hagaman
al.
19303—Jenkins Sons Merc Co
Hassett
19366—Holmes v Huckins Hotel.
19376—St Clair v Vensant et al.
19378—Murray v Okla Ry Co.
19411—Garland v Carpathia Ptg Co
19446—King v Luther Oil G Co.
19460—Howard v Cal St Life Inc
Co.
16206— Milton v Avey.
16207— Same v Same.
WEDNESDAY. SEPTEMBER 20.
15864—S W States Lbr Co v Au-
relins.
18479—Gibson r Frisco et al.
W $3500 6 per 8-1.
19145—Perry v R I.
19307—Morton v Lusk.
19344—Cale v Taylor.
19381—Barnes v Okla Ry Co.
19433—Futihanser v Rourke et al.
17851—Kelburg v Myers.
19502—Newton et al v Motor Sales
19520—Rardin v Amer Natl Bk.
18144—Smith v M K & T Ry.
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 21.
19223—Krahl v Chaffre et al.
19310—Cress & Robinson v Falls
et al.
19387—Owensboro Wagon Co
Hldlebaugh.
19407—McRay v Randerson et el.
19439—Enochs v Bd Co Conr.
19497—Nat Bk Dallas v 1st St Bk
19506—Spellers v Oklt. Ry Co.
19522— St Exch Bk v 'Hubycha et
al.
19533—Highfill v Cartwright.
19578—Payne v Payne. •
FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 22
12939—Deeper Bros Lbr Co v Eg-
gleston
16738—Strickland v R I.
17435—Goodman v Royston
18978—Guthrie Edmond Elec Ry.
v Monroe
19304—Shirk v Cox et al
19372— Furman v Jackson et al
19373— Inter St Mtge Tr Co v Hoi
Iis
19438—Vendig v Vendig
19493—Thompson v Randt
19503—Storm v Botts
19523— John Deere Plow Co v Ray
et al
19197—Alex Drug Co v Hayes
SATURDAY SEPTEMBER 23
19457—Buchanan v Buchanan
18268—Spillman v Spillman
18318—Sasseen v Sasseen
18515—Hibbett v Hibbett
18756—Carr v Carr
18805—Atwood v Atwood
18972—Legway v Legway
19009—Brucker v Brucker
19019— Cavender v Cavender
19020— North v North
19136— Howell v Howell
19137— Malone v Malone
19856—Stevenson v Stevenson
19164—Austin v Austin
19311—Rowlette v Rowlette
19317—Rhoades v Rhoades
19377—Asher v Asher
19379—Beiford v Belford
19394—Holden v ‘Holden
19447—Traweek v Traweek
19461—Todd v Todd
19676—Conyers v Conyers
19486—Hazelwood v Hazelwood
19505—Smallwood v Smallwood
19718—Fanning v Fanning
19771—Shepard v Shepard
19176—Shannon v Shannon
19574—Baxter v Duke
19715—Cook v Cook
19534—Ray v Ray
19733—Mills v Mills
STENOGRAPHER
MRS. VEST
DEPOSITIONS General Work
PHONE W. 7200
NOTARY 301 Patterson Bldg.
Strand Theater
iu w. item
Pictures of Quality Only
TOM CLIFT
DEPOSITIONS
NOTARY
803 State Natl Bank Bldg.
Office Phone W-2338
Res. Phone W-706
(3845)
ORDER FOR HEARING PETITION
TO SELL REAL ESTATE
No. ......
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County
83.
IN THE COUNTY COURT .
In the matter of die Guardianship of
Chas. Gilpin.
It appearing to the satisfaction of
the Court fropi the verified petition of
Flora Gilpin, Guardian of the estate
•f Chas Gilpin, a minor on file here-
in, that it is necessary to sell the real
estate, belonging to said estate, and
described in said petition, for the reas
ons and purposes in said petition set
out.
Therefore, it is ordered by the Court,
That an persons interested in the es-
tate of said Chas. Gilpin, appear be-
fore the County Court of the County
of Oklahoma, State of Oklahoma, In
the Court Room thereof. In said Coun-
ty and State, on the 9th day of Octo-
ber, 1916 at 9 o'clock A M. of said
day then and there to show cause If any
they have, why an order, as prayed for
in said petition shoYld not be
granted to the said guardian to sell
said real estate of said minor, at
either public or private sale, for
the reasons and purposes mentioned
in said petition as he shall judge
be for the best interest of said
estate and of all parties Interest-
ed therein.
It is the further order of the Court
that copies of this order be_ posted up
me
Borrow
Local Money
Saved by
Local People
That’s
Localizing
And Means Better
Local Conditions
The Local
Building & Loan
Association
185 W. Main.
Phone W. 469
“We Clean, Others Try”
We Thor,
oughly Clean
and Press
Your Suit for
Prompt Auto
Service to all
Parte of the
City.
For Faultless Dry Cleaning
CALL
Terminal
CLEANING WORKS
10 N Hudson
Walnut 4838
(3856)
NOTICE BY PUBLICATION
No. 20098
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County
ss.
Ray Dovicky, Plaintiff, vs., Mildred Do-
vicky, Defendant.
Said defendant, Mildred Dovicky,
will take notice that the plaintiff,
Ray Dovicky, did on the 6th day of
September, 1916, file a petition in the
District Court of Oklahoma County,
State of Oklahoma, for a divorce
against the defendant Mildred Dovicky,
on the ground of wilful abandonment
for more than one year, on the part
of the defendant, prior to the filing of
the said petition, and for costs of suit,
and you the said defendant must an-
swer the said petition filed therein by
the said plaintiff, on or before the
20th day of October, 1916, or the said
petition will be taken as true, and
judgment will be rendered according as
prayed for in said petition.
For further particulars you are re-
ferred to the petition now on fife in
the Court Clerk’s Office in the District
Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.
(SEAL) JAMES BEATY
COURT CLERK.
By CLIFF MYERS
DEPUTY.
A. H. M©y®r, Attorney for Plaintiff.
9-8 9-30
Gravel Roofing
NOTHING BUT ROOFS1
NEW ROOFS - REPAIRING
Jas. F. Devine
Wal. $883—Wal. (818
219-20 Majaatle Building
F. L. KELLEY
.STENOGRAPHER A NOTAR1
Depositions, Briefa and
General work.
Phone W. 7079. Rea. 640?
DEPOSITIONS
MISS HAZEL DWYER
PUBL.'C STENOGRAPHER
S2i Amir Natl. Bk. Bldg.
NOTARY Talephona Mapla 179*
PHONE WALNUT 4144
FO/FGFY
OFFICE 9 S Hudson
Are Vou Tired of Paint Troubles?
We do clean and careful work in
Painting, Paper Hanging, Decorating
FRESH PAINT AT $2.00 PER GAL.
WEATHERPROOF PAINT MFG CO.
21-23 N. Hudson. Walnut 414.
in three public places in the County, om
of which shall be at the Court House
lid:
(3874)
NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE
No. 18872
In the District Court of the Thirteenth
Judicial District of the State of Okla
homa, within and for Oklahoma Coun
ty
H. Steinmyer, Plaintiff, vs., Mary P.
Meek, Fred Wm. Miller, A. F. Maher
and B S Chandler. Defendants.
By virtue of an order of sale to me
•ut of the
pend-
was
ler or
directed and delivered, issued oi
bove entitled Court in an acti<
le
where the hearing is to be held; that
this order be served personally
ersons interested in the estate,
any general guardian of a minor so Inter
ested, who are residents of the County,
and on said Chas. Gilpin, at least
ten days before the time set for
hearing: that copies of said or-
der be mailed to all persons, interested
in said estate, who are not residents of
the county, with postage thereon pre-
paid; and that, if the nostoffice address
of any such person interested in said
estate is unknown, a copy of this
order to show cause shall be pub-
lished for two successive weeks In The
D" !!v Legal News, a newspaper publish-
ed in this County, the first publication
of which shall not be less than fifteen
days before the time fixed for said hear
ing.
Dated this 6th day of September,
1916.
(SEAL) WILLIAM H. ZWICK
COUNTY JUDGE
9-6 10-9
(3857)
PUBLICATION NOTICE
No. 19997
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County,
In the District Court within and for
said County and State
Interstate Building & Loan Company,
a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs., Okla-
homa City Land & Development Com
pany, a corporation, et al., Defend-
ants.
The said defendant.
D. MANN
PLUMBNC, CAS FITTING AND
REPAIRING.
Phone W. 693 424 W. Second
Oklahoma City
NOON DAY
Luncheon 40c
EVENING CLUB DINNERC
75c to $1.00
SUNDAY EVENING DINNERS
$1.00
6071— 'MoLellan Engl'sh v r J Lai
ky
6072— Jap Albright v Jacob M DIs
kinson Recr
6073— Henry & T W Rowley v same
5940—John OlBOn V Elmer E Stev-
ens.
6022—Tucker Furn Co v O J Briley
4325—State v Geo Trailor.
SEPTEMBER 21
5063—Robt I. Watson v Fred Bonn
5125—Theo Maxfield v H B Lock-
ett
5876—H S Jones v McMann Oil Co
5878— Clara Wildman v Bernice
Neubauer
6026—W I Thorne v Chas T Lock-
wood et al
SEPTEMBER 22
5879— J C Thurmond v Jacob M.
Dickinson Recr
5883—John Parks v M K & T Ry.
5887—W A Smith v John B Parker.
5892—J T Sims et al v M R Gibson
4324—State v Nettie Kiefer
4323—State v Mattie Simpson.
4322—State v George Nitzel.
will take noti<
Emma Moores,
a that she has been
sued in the nbovee entitled action, In
the Jibove court, by .the above named
plaintiff, and that she must appear
and answer the petition of the plain-
tiff' on or before the 20th day of Octo-
ber, 1916. or the allegations of said pe
tition will be taken as true and judg-
ment rendered in favor of the plain-
tiff adjudging it to have a first valid,
subsisting and binding lien by reason
of the judgment owned and held by
the plaintiff on certain lands, tene-
ments, improvements, railway tracks
and appurtenances thereunto belonging
as the property of the Oklahoma City
Land and development Company, and
that the mortgage assigned to the de-
fendant, Emma Moores, upon certain
portions of said real estate and im-
provements thereon situated and locat-
(3316)
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
4 No. 19980
StaJe of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County,
In the District Court within and for
sadd County and State.
The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Com-
pany, a corporation. Plaintiff, vs. Wil-
liam Ribble Belle Jackson Ribble, The
Tradesman State Bank, a Corporation,
f State Bank, a corporation,
Oklahoma News Company, a corpora-
tion, John C. Adams and J. T. Fulp, De
fendante.
„ The said defendant. Belle Jackson
Ribble. will take notice that she has
been sued by the above named plaintiff
in the above entitled Court, and that
she must appear and answer to the
the plain
of Octobi
COuNT* COURT
WILLIAM H. ZWICK..........judge
JAMES BEATY.........Court Clerk
Phone .................Walnut 7522
The motion docket in the County
Court will be called every see nd and
fourth Monday In each month.
(3870)
NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE
No. 17672
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County,
ss.
j In the District Court in and for said
County and State.
| Henry Kehm. Plaintiff, vs... St. Johns
i Methodist Episcopal Church, South De
j fendant.
Notice is hereby given that under
! and by virtue of an order of sale Is-
j sued to me out of the District Court
: of Oklahoma County. State of Oklahoma,
j I will, on the 13th day of October,
j 1916, at 2 o’clock P. M. of saiid day,
; at the front door of the Court House
in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, offer at
( Sheriffs sale to the highest and best
] bidder for cash in hand, without ap—
praisement, the following property.
Lots Six (6), Seven (7), Eight
1 (8), and Nine (9), in Block No.
Bight. (8). in Johns Byrd Lincoln
Park Addition to Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma, according to the record-
ed plat thereof.
The above described property is
sold as the property of the said defen-
ant, The St. Johns Melhodist Episco-
pal Church South, and the Trustees
NEW CA8ES
_ I P“* ^UUI LII OWUlll, OHU Lite X I UBiccn
«oqa cs+o+A bw-i, ni, ,, r* t I thereof, and 4s directed by said order
6090 State Exch Bk v F C Leach ; Cf saie to be sold as upon execution,
et al App from R W Maupin J P.
MOTIONS & FILINGS.
i to satisfy
5956—Beatty v Steveu New tr.
6036—Amburn v Tsx&* Co To dis
with prej.
5743—Lee v Barnes et al To dis-
close assets
the County of
tate of Oklahoma, wil
1th the prayer of the plaintiff’s pe-
Oklahom;
will, in accoi
a
>rd;
and
ance
NOTICE
above entitled Court in an action i
Ing therein wherein H. Steinmyer
plaintiff and Mary P. Meek, Fred Wm.
filler, A. F. Maher and B S Chandler
I will, on October
M. at the
in
defendants, I will,
13th, 1916, at 2 o’clock P.
Oklahomt
of Oklah
West front door of the Court House
\ Oklahoma Cou
la, offer for sale and sen at
ion to the highest bidder for
<3852)
TO CREDITORS
No. 2836
State of Oklahoma. Oklahoma County
ss.
To the creditors of Fred D. Parsons,
deceased.
All persons having claims against
Fred D. Parsons, deceased, are re-
quired to present the same with the
necessary vouchers, to the undersigned
administrator at office of Giddings &
Lillard, 119^ West Main Street, Ok-
lahoma Citv. Oklahoma County. Ok-
lahoma, within four months of the
datp hereof or the same will be for-
ever barred.
Dated this 7th day of September
1916.
LAURA A. PARSONS
Administratrix
9-7 9-22
tition, be vacated, set aside, cancelled,
and held for naught as against the
judgment lien of the plaintiff, and the
plaintiff’s lien upon all of said real es-
tate. personal property and improve-
ments within the County of Oklahoma
and State of Oklahoma, will be fore-
closed and ordered sold to pay the
plaintiff s claim for the sum of $15.-
62C.40 and costs taxed at $115.55 addi-
tional, with interest at the rate of
six per cent per annum thereon from
the 16th day of August. 1916.
WITNESS My hand and -the seal of
said Court this 8th day of September,
A D. 1916.
(SEAL) JAMES BEATY
COURT CLERK
By CLIFF MYERS
DEPUTY
Wilson, Tomerlin & Buckho’t*. Attor-
neys for Plaintiff 9-8 9-30
she rr
tition
10th da;
gations mereoi wm be taken as true and
judgment rendered in favor of the plain-
tiff for the sum ©f $11,430,08, with intec-
ai
of the plaintiff on or before the
y of October,
gations thereof will be taken
1916,
the alle—
true and
foreclosure upon
escrioea premises located .
in Oklahoma County, State of
i, to-wit:
Lots Five (5) and Six (6) in Block
wo (2), Main Street Addition to
klahoma City, Oklahoma,
est from the fiirst day of August. 1916,
at rate of 6 per cent per annum,
and decreeing a foreclosure upon the
following described premises located and
situated in ’ ’
Oklahoma,
Lots Fi
T
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,
to pay sadd debt, interest and costs in-
cluding an attorney fee of $1,000.00.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said
Court in Oklahoma City. Oklahoma, this
25th day of August, 1916.
(SEAL) JAMES BEATY
COURT CLERK
By CHAS. COLT.
Welty & Orr, Attorneys for Plaintiff,
8-25 9-15
lorn;
public auction to
cash, the following lands and tene-
ments situated in Oklahoma County,
State of Oklahoma, to-wit:
The West half of the following
tract or' parcel of land, to-wit: A
part of the North east Quarter of
Section 25. Township 12. North,,
Range 3 West of th“ I. M.. describ-
ed as follows, to-wit:
Beginning at a point 60 rods
North Of the South east corner of
said Quarter Section, thence North
30 rods: thence West 53 1-3 rods:
thence South 30 rods: thence East
to the place of beginning, Contain-
ilng 10 acres, more or less,
Except Lots 1 to 8 In Block 1,
and Lots 29 to 32 in Block 2 In
Stelnmeyer Gardens Addition to Ok-
lahoma City, according to the re-
corded plat thereof.
>r so much thereof as may be neces—
sary to satisfy in full the judgment
rendered in said cause.
Said property to be sold as afore-
said will be sold to satisfy the judgm?nt
rendered In favor of said plaintiff
decreeing that there was due to said
decreeing that there was due to said
plaintiff from N N GatUn and Katie
Gatlin the sum of $2,155.20. with Inter-
est from March 11th. 1916 at the rate
of 3 per cent per annum, and an at-
torney’s fee of $101.83, and to satisfy
all costs of said sale and this action,
all under foreclosure of mortgage
said lands and tenements In accor
ance with the judgment rendered In
said cause.
Signed at Oklahoma City. Oklahoma,
this 12th day of September, 1916.
M. C. BINION
Sheriff of Oklahoma County. State
of Oklahoma. . .
By A. W ORCUTT
Undersheriff
Wrfeht A Biinn. Attorneys for Plain-
tiff 8-12 10-1*
(3830)
NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE
No. 2747
Notice is hereby given that In pur-
suance of an order of the County
Court of the County of Oklahoma and
State of Oklahoma, made on the 28th
day of August. 1916, In the matter of
♦he estate of Stephen Hartnett, Charles
Hartnett and Loretta Hartnett, minors,
the undersigned., as the Guardian of
said minors, will sell at public ven-
due to the highest bidder for cash,
subject to confirmation by said County
Court, on Monday the eighteenth day
of September, 1916 at 2 o’clock P. M.
at the West front door of the Court
Howse. in said County of Oklahoma,
all the right, title interest and estate of
the said Stephen Hartnett. Charles
Hartnett and Loretta Hartnett, minors,
and all the right, title and Interest
that the said estate has bv operation
of law, or otherwise acquired In and
to all the certain lots, pieces or par-
land situate, lying and being
tfahomi
hounded and des<
follow!)
In the County of Oklahoma. State of
Oklahoma, bounded and described as
'ng terms
follows, and upon the
conditions to-wit:
Tne undivided half interest of the
TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 19
14043—Stokes v Xnn Rxc Co. There I* never any mention nbju*
17240—Knight 4t nl r HID et al. anrticlent time on nny legal advet
10020—Meacham et al » Bourke et1 tlremant that rnaa tn 3e Legal News
said minors In the homestead
James J. Hartnett deceased
of
Fbthe-
sald minors In Lots Twenty
three (23), and Twenty four (24)
in Block Eleven ((11), In F. M.
Gault's Second Addition to Okla-
homa City. Oklahoma, subject to
a mortgage given by said dece-
dent and Ms wlf* on which thore
Is due and unpaid a balance of
31654.84 and subject to homestead
Interest of Daisy L Hartnett wife
and widow of said deceased.
Tne terms of sale. Cash In hand.
Dated the Slat day of August. 1916.
C. H. SHUBEBT
GUARDIAN.
8-31 f-18
(3796)
NOTICE
No. 20018
State of Oklahoma. County of Okla-
homa. ss.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
In re ex parte proceedings of Charles
Armstrong, for change of name
Notice is hereby given that I have
filed in the office of th*» Court Clerk In
and for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma,
my application to have the name
of Charles Armstrong changed to
Charles Dlngman. the latter being
the name which I have always used and
always been known by.
All persons Interested in this matter
are hereby notified that they must file
their objections herein. If anv they
have, not later than October 2nd. 1916, or
I shall apply to the Court for a Judgment
and decree as prayed for In the petition
filed in this cause.
Dated at Oklahoma Citv. Oklahoma,
this 19th day of August, 1916.
CHARLES ARMSTRONG
Known as Charles Dingman.
(SEAL) JAMES BEATY
COURT CLERK
By CLIFF MYERS
DEPUTY.
Gustave A. Erfxon. Attorney for Peti-
tioner, 504-5-6 Patterson Building Ok-
lahoma City. Oklahoma 8-19 9-19 |
PROCEEDINGS.
5996—Bk of Drummond v Cole et
al. 9-22
6001—Dawson v Johnson Strik
5971—Kingkade Hotel v Callicote
9-18
6036—Amburn v Texas Co
5988—Galloway v Amal
Strik.
I oi sale to be sold as upon execul
without appraisement, according to law,
i to satisfy a judgment in favor of the
! plaintiff, Henry Kehm. for the sum of
! Two Thousand Three Hundred ten dol-
! lars with interest from March 3rd, 1916,
i at the rate of ten per cent per annum
i until paid and $200.00 attorneys fees
| and all costs.
Witness my hand nt my office
; said Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, this
i 12th day of September. 1916.
I M. C. BINION
Oklahoma County, State
By A. W. ORCTTTT
Undersheriff
Edwards, Attorneys for
9-12 10-13
I Two Tho
Sheri:
Oklah-
iff of
ioma
Carlisle and
Plaiintiff.
PROBATE.
NEW CASES.
2857— Gdnsp Lee Baughman Pet.
for lett.
2858— Gdnsp Owen Moss
2859— Est Samuel Mayer
adm.
(3862)
q ir ORDER FOR HEARING PETITION TO
a ~ SELL REAL ESTATE
O Co. tfo.__
State of Oklahoma. Oklahoma County,
■a.
IN THE COUNTY COURT
In the Matter of the Estate of C. A.
| Compton, Deceased.
I It appearing to the satisfaction of
the Court from the verlf’ed petition of
E. M. Hurry, the Administrator of the
estate of C. A. Compton, deceased, on
file herein, that it is necessary
.esta"
Same
Pet for
MOTIONS AND FILINGS.
We Loan Money
On Oklahoma City Homes
St?*iatics show that more loan* are
paid at maturity through the
■nonthlypayment plan than through
straight loans.
The coat of our loan is the same to
you a, •>% on a straight loan.
Borrow from us to
Pay off the old mortgage
Build the new house
Buy your home.
A'e will loan you 60% of the cash
/alte of your property.
Cail on us for particulars.
The Oklahoma City
Building and Loan
Association
Phone Wa'nut 21S.
204 Majestic Building.
, 2638—Est
sell R E.
Elizabeth Martin To
PROCEEDING*.
1738—Est M Smith 9-25
COUNTY COURT ASSIGNMENTS
D C.
If a proof of publication la inta-
r-laced It takes Just 10 minutes tr.
get e duplicate from the Legal News.
New Located 314 Seearit- Bldg
Phase Wei. 43
ELLIS STEPHENSON
ABSTRACTOR.
SUCCESSOR TO OKLAHOMA ABSTRACT CO.
Bonded by Masseehussetts Bonding end Ins. Co.
Oar Swvtei Pbwmti Court Hounr hW»l3$8*. You ore WaJrcireto Coll ter
SEPTEMBER 14
6025—Harriett Billingsley v
Shiver et al
6027— 0 E Butler v E Bracht
6028— Julia Mereness v Okla R R
Co.
6029— Skirvin Oper Co v H H Gip
son.
6030— Pleas E Nelson v Common-
wealth Ben Co.
SEPTEMBER 15
6031— Skirvin Oper Co v Geo D. '
Keyesn
6032— Underwood Tjrpewr Co r C A
Conley
6033— Nat Surety Co v W A Love
joy et al
6036— G O Amburn v The Texas Co
6037— W J Adams v C F Garland
6040— R L Bucy v New State Brg
Assn
6041— Rosie Gordon v Mrs W P Con
ger
SEPTEMBER 18
6042— James F Stochl Admr v C W
Hubycka et al
6046— C H Wilson et al v Roy Cogs
well et al
6052— Walter N Kuntz v Roy Cogs
well
6053— J M Condet v J C Gilmore
SEPTEMBER 19
605.7—J R Simmons v Jacob M Dic-
kinson et al Recrs
6056—C Kessler et al v George Far
rer
6061— Investor Pub Co v Fid Mut L.
Co.
6062— U S Tire Co v W A McKee
6063— R N Barbee v Jacob M Di-
kinson Recr
SEPTEMBER 20
to sell
the real, estate belonging to said estate,
and described in said petition, for tho
reasons and purposes in said petition
set out.
Therefore,
That all p
tate of the
ed
it Is ordered by the Court
•sons interested in the
persor
said C. A. Compton, deceas-
appear before the County Court of tho
tu, n|)|7v.ai UCIUIC me ^/VUlli; UUUI I
County of Oklahoma. State of Okla-
homa. in the Court Room thereof, tai
said County and State, on the 10th day
of October, 1916, at 9 o’clock A M. ef
said day, then and there to show cause.
ed for in
granted to
real estate
public or private sale,
ioned
id petition should not be
id administrator to sell said
of said minor, at either
and purposes mentk
shall
for the reason
in said petition,
he shall judge to be for the best
interest of said estate, and of
ties interested therein.
It Is the further order of the Court;
that copies of this order be
thre
all par-
:ou
posted ___
in three public places in the County
J one of which shall be at the Court
j House where the hearing Is to be lujld.
that a copy of this order be served per-
sonally on all persons Interested in the
ite. any ee:
Interested.
estate, any general guardian of a minor
»d. and
heir of the de
nd an.
eceased, who are rea
dents of the County, at least ten da;
y legatee, devisee
:ed, who are real-
ty.
before the time set for said hearing:
that copies of said order be mailed to all
persons, interested In said estate, who
sre not residents of the County, with
postage thereon prepaid: and that. If
post office address of
rson interested in said estate
lown. a copy of this order
cause shall be published for fcwo
copy of
order to
1916.
show
ccess
weeks in The Dally Legal News
newspaper published in th's Coun-
first publication of which
not be less than fifteen
before the time fixed for said
ng.
Dated this 11th day of September.
WILLIAM H. ZWICK
COUNTY JUDGE
9-11 9-25
ty. th<
notice shall
da
(SEAL!
(3866)
NOTICE BY PUBLICATION
No. 20127
In the District Court within and for
Oklahoma County. State of Okla-
homa.
John S. Peeler. Plaintiff, vs., Eva M.
Peeler. Defendant.
The said defendant Eva. M. Pooler,
will take notice that she has been sued
In the above named court for divorce
on the ground* of gross neglect of
duty and desertion and abandonment,
and that you. said defendant, must an-
swer the petition filed therein by said
plaintiff, on or before the 23rd day of
October. 1918. or said petition ~ will bo
taken u
• i*»rn w true and judgment $nr
* a okr» ti Plaintiff for divorce will be rendered
6065— J 8 Snriver ' Tra B Iypv » accordingly.
6066— C B Norton v W O Harris j (SEAL) JAMES BEATY
<WWi«—Dr J R Knoipr v V,' n Tate; COTTRT CLKRK.
6070—J W Scott t Okm Cit v June ' r C Dl!PtITT.
ton Ry Co J. K. Wright. Attorney for Pt-InttfT.
I 9-11 10-1
—
If It’s For Your Office Go to Manly’s,” 210 West First St. Phone Walnut 125
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View one place within this issue that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
Murphy, John H. The Daily Legal News (Oklahoma City, Okla.), Vol. 13, No. 10, Ed. 1 Wednesday, September 13, 1916, newspaper, September 13, 1916; (https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc1137342/m1/1/?q=houston: accessed July 5, 2024), The Gateway to Oklahoma History, https://gateway.okhistory.org; crediting Oklahoma Historical Society.