Tulsa Daily Legal News (Tulsa, Okla.), Vol. 27, No. 18, Ed. 1 Thursday, January 22, 1925 Page: 6 of 6
six pages : ill. ; page 20 x 13 in. Digitized from 35 mm. microfilm.View a full description of this newspaper.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Page Six
TlifIRSDAY JANUAAY 22
fULSA DAILY LEdAL'NEWS
DISTRICT COURTS
IContinu40- from Page On0
27633—Ross v Ware et at
' 27345—Platters & litech Bank v
Lack et at
27732—johnson et al v City et al
27227—Anna Levian v Mrs Morris
Brown'
- 16148—Pickering Lbr Co v Campbell
- Wednesday March 4
27929—Brown v Thompkins et al
27747—Clapp v Brown et al
27535—M K & T By Co v Stuckey
Co' Treas
27530—Webster v Snodgrass et at
13526—M K & T By Co v Dickey
29433—In re disso Donnelly Drift Co
- Thursday March 5
23244--Whitestine v Ramb et al
23244--Whitestine v Rambo (mo)
SC 2545—Oil Well Sup Co v Fleming
- et al
' 6222—Oil Well Sup Co v OverallOil
Co et al
22931-0i1 Well Sup Co v Wilcox
Friday March 6
27631—Birck v Elder
Monday March 9
27546—Reed v Mounts et al
27835—City Nati Bank of Wichita
- Falls v Friedner et al
27935—Jackson v A T &SF Ry Co
27942--Ranney Rig Bldg Co v Allen
et al
Tuesday March 10
17535—Keeling v Keeling
24539—Briggs v Jones
20542—Marion Mch Fdry & Sup Co
v Volger et al
28139—Winters v Hahn et al
Wednesday March 11
28248—Schofield v Schofield
28442—Garnicia v Garnicia
28238—Peck v Peck
285404-Beaver et al v Bland et al
Thursday March 12
28626—D G Lbr Co v Bosse et al
28949—Midwest Bldg Mat Co v Pat
ent Scaffolding Co
- 28835—Star Pipe Line Co v Kistler
29234—Hackleman v Hackleman
Friday March 13
28938-1Morton v Pratt
28940—West v Reynolds et al-
- 28029—Sudheimer v Behning et al
Monday March 16
26644—Priest v St L & S F Ry Co
29329—Leeper v Leeper
29149—Pure Oil Co v Barnes et al
29341—Cravens v Lebow
29150—Western Sup Co v Heald et
al
Tuesday March 17
29239—Union Nati Bank of Bartles-
ville v Frantz et al
28934—Conway v Lynch et al
29346—Toney v Adams 0 & G Co
Wednesday March 18
23933—Snodgrass v Dan A Burton
Const Co
25632—Miller v City et al
26946—Bloom v Moskowitz
20544—Van Siclen v Hunt et al
Thursday March 19
20838—Van v Hunt et al
25243—Harvey v Tidal Refg Co
Friday March 20
26430—Giddings v Arnold (garn)
Monday March 23
25242—Rogers et al v Daniel
27230—Hamilton v Brown et al
27244—Plumbers Sup Co v Glessner
et al
Tuesday March 24
27546—Reed v Mounts et al
Monday May 4
-18339—Thompson et al v City et at
18435—Warner et al v City ct al
18822—Morgan v City et al
18821—Cooley v City et al
19239—Phillips v City et al
23093—Sillik v City et al
17974I—Singleton et al v City et at
17871—Weston v City et al
P
1111111410magONA
DISTRICT COURT TRIAL
DOCKET
Division No 3
i Non Z I J Holt Judge
lv--------- —
- -
s Friday Jan 23
22452—C C & S hy Co v Con-
stantin Ref Co
22562—Probst v Fume Imam
28854-r-Argentos v City
23261—Sligo Iron Store Co v Jacobs
23470—Boone v Lowe
23654—Donne ly v Perry
23969—Hill v 6 & 1 Oil Co
24054—Bickerson v Raymond
Saturday Jan 24
29158—Lewis v Coates (mo)
29062--Lewis v S W Mfg Co (3
dems)
24962—Peoples B & L Assn v Brit-
' ton (mo for new trial)
26170—State v McCulley (dem 8
mo)
29559—Nati Mfg Co v Stoney et al
'(mots)
27964—Funston v City (dem)
-23063—II S Zinc Co v Colburn
' (no)
Monday Jan 26
24070-1--Citizens St Bank Okemah v
Owens
24854—Independent 0 & G Coy Bit-
- VI-Bar Petr Co: '
'24961—McNeill v Watson
' 25252—Cramer v Reinke
25357—Coffman v Squires
25766—Lundquist v Heiser -
25951—Citizens Nati Bank 'Broken
Arrow v Childers '
26054—Ryan v Pritchard
24368—Kaase v St L & S FIty Co
19874—Maharkey v Page et al
Tuesday Jan 27
24454—Gifford v Hintze
24561—Sample v Watson
26472—Cummings v Nichols T & S
Co
Wednesday Jan 28
16764—Central Oil Co v Reed
25958—Stout v McLain
25967—Snell Jr v Ward
25978—Culbertson v Parks
26156—Leonard & Braniff v Brady:
20157— Dallier Oil Co v Indian 011
Corp
26159—Sigler y Byrd
Thursday Jan 29
26162—Rogers v Evans
26163—Fasken v Tibbets & Pleasant
26167—Brenner AuteSup Co v Oil
City Garage
26169—McBirney v Levin
26174—Penn Olda 0 Corp v Chief-
tain Gass Co
26364—Griver v Crowe
26551—Mining & Dev Co v Sabine
0 & Mark Co
Friday Jan 30
24875—Quincy-Ricker Nati Bank &
Ti Co v Brown
26053—Ft Worth & D C Ry v Okla
Petr & Gas° Co
25254—Winks v Layne
27752—Deming Inv Co v Beck
27856—Dickason Goodman Lbr Co v
Beck
27870—Deming Inv Co v Dons
26173—First Nati Bank y Comar Oil
Co
26362—Burgess v Prairie 0 & G Co
26759—Spratt v Exchange Trust Co
adm
Saturday Jan 31
29157—Walker v Walker (mo)
—Edwards v Edwards (me &
cit)
29199— Baldwin v Baldwin
29074—Weber et al v Decker et al
29467—Sanger Bros v Worley (mo)
24162—Kennedy v Stuckey
24657—Conti Cas Co v Bagby
(dem)
Monday Feb 2
27659—Howell v Stein
27668—Bank of Aurora v Feldman
P27670Benedict v City
17859—Charles v Dresser
17966—Hartzoge v Marshall
l27669—Bk of Aurora v Freed
Tuesday Feb 3
27162—Meister Bros Brecht Co v
Rhodes
27255—McCoy v Thompson
27358—Centr Milk Prod Co v Prod
Nati Bank
27567—Davison Elec Co v Harris
21566-67—Milner et al v Brooks et al
28753—Local B & L Assn v Moga
Wednesday Feb 4
26961—Anglin exec v Tibbets &
Pleasant
27072—Heath v Heald
27073—Page v Connelly
25678—Security Nati Bk v Short
22859—Brown v Gainer
25855—Rosenfield v Ruby
Thursday Feb 5
26761—Atlas Life Ins Co v Boone
26951—Jones v Hicks
26952—Roberts v Stekoll
26957—Calvert Mtg Co v LytaL
Friday Feb 6
26569—Sweet v Saar)
26659—Modernola Co v Jacobs
26660—Alexander Shake ly Pub Co v
Verland 0 & G Co
26672—Sinopoula v Jacobs
Monday Feb 9
26576—Beck vMK&T Ry Co
Tuesday Feb 10
27859—Brown v McIndoo
27368—Evans v Evans
25461—Truseon Steel Co v Hingle
26259—McNeal v Bain
Wednesday Fob 11
28663—Hinkle v Hinkle
2635I3—Smart v Stein
Thursday February 12
8373—Plymouth Wall Paper Co v
Schonwald
—Heirs v McDaniel&
Wednesday February 25
22857-Rogers v Parks
I DISTRICT COURT TRIAL
DOCKET
Division No
°MET
I
lion No
Friday January 23
27391—Johnson v Braun (mo)
25799—Johnson v Wright (mo)
21281—Richards v Taylor et al (mo)
28181—Torner et al vMK&T Ry
Co (dem)
26079—Security Nati Bank v Bohne-
fel& 25800—Security Nati Bank vIlayden
Rosser-Casebeer Pun Co
24085—Mann v Biumenfield
21379—Amer Glyc Co v Schuler
9885—McIntosh v City
26897City v Schofield
22796—Simonds v Lane (mo)
26093—Sec Nati Bank v Cain
Monday Jan 26
27293—Araughn v Dunbar
25883—Montgomery v Ray
25393—Durham Realty Corp v Ar
22296—Battle v Estes
26180—Farnham v Halliburton-Ab
bott Co '
16897—Chamness v Myers
22278—Skinner vWade
Tuesday Jan 27
22189—Bryant v Freeman
--Selberling Tire & Rubber Co
v Gorman
Wednesday Jan 28
25880-81—Coy admr v Waite Phil-
lips Co
20980—Goins v Partridge
22884—Morrow vMK &T Ry Co
24895—Bell v Olda U Ry Co
Thursday Jan 29
24984—Huddleson v Gordon
26779—Vacuum Oil Co v guts
18585-7-Redfearn v Johns
21284—Bedford Carthage Stone Co
v -Brady
Friday Jan: 30
37297—Stoffel v Prentice
21095—Farrior v Marshall
Monday Feb 2
22294—Gillum v Heilbron
26790—Clinton v Terwilliger
Wednesday February 4
13081—Foster v Wooley et al
01
DISTRICTDCcO4rEcC'RIMINAL
W B Williams Judge I
to
1
Friday Jan 23
3062— State v Marvin Miller Steal-
ing an automobile
8067—State v White Davis & George
Bussy Grand larceny
8039—State v B M Mayfield Pass-
ing a bogus check
2744—State v H P Wetzel Embes-
zlement 2987—State v Charles V Miller Re-
ceiving stolen property
Monday Jan 26
3094—State v Hubert Johnson Mur-
der 3287—State V H R Conklin alias
Harold A Rumbley alias H R Ross
Passing a bogus check
Tuesday Jan 27
3299—State v Clyde Berry Robbery
Wednesday Jan 28
3294—State v Buber Ware Robbery
3285—State v J M Peters Robbery
Thursday Jan 29
3246—State v Henry Howard As-
sault with intent to rape
Friday Jan 30
3286—State v Hubert Adams As-
sault with a dangerous weapon
Monday Feb 2
8290—State v Eldon Waters Steal-1
ing an automobile 1
3166—State v E R Reynolds Murder
3089—State v C M Griffith & Gro-
ver Bloom Robbery
Tuesday Feb 3
3219—State v Russell E Freeman
Passing a bogus check
8222—State v Russell E Freeman
Passing a bogus check
Wednesday Feb 4
3250—State v T L Powell Embes-1
zlement
2261—State v Mamie Gowdy Big 1
amy 1
Thursday Feb 5
3265—State v Johnnie Justice Mur-
der Friday Feb IL
3277—State v P J Hartman Know-
Ing ly marrying a bigamist
Monday Feb 8
3174—State v Mildred Odem & C E
Purdy
Tuesday Feb 9
8292—State v W S Lyttle Assault
with a dangerous weapon
3239—State v Maria McBride Burg
lary
Wednesday Feb 10
32§7—State v Tom Risby Burglary
3272—State v Wm 1' Talley Passing
a bogus check
1 RAILROAD TIME TABLE 1
IT LOUIS SAN FRANCISCO
INBOUND TRAINS
Arriving
No Time
403 Prom St Louis and Joplin 12:05 am
404 From Oklahoma :lity sad
Sapulpa 5 :00 am
111 From Kan City-St Louis 6:30 an
From St Louis 7 :00 sm
118 From Dallas-Ft Worth 7:50 am
603 From Waynoica and Enid 11:45
8 From Okhhoma City- 11:50 am
7 From St Louis I :10 pm
110 From Vernon and Enid 6:10 pm
10 From Oklahoma City 6 :20 pm
117 From Kansas City-Joplin 8:15 pm
113 From Oklahoma City 10:50 pm
428 Vrom Holdenville 11 :25 am
OUTBOUND TRAINS
'rm Departing
No Time
43 For qapulpa and Okla CRY 1:85 am
118 For Joplin 8 :10 am
111 For Folerman and Dallas 6:40 am
9 For Oklahoma City 7:10 am
811 For Enid and Vernon 7:40 am
404 For Kansas City and St
Louis 12:10 pm
8 For St Louis & Memphis 12:30 pm
607 For Enid and Waynoks I:15 pm
7 For Oklahoma City Okmul-
gee and Ada 2:25 pm
10 For St Louis 6:30 pm
117 For Ft Worth & Dallas" 8:50 pm
112 For Kansas City 11 :00 pm
425 For Holdenville 5:25 pm
MIDLAND VALLEY
INBOUND TRAINS
Tram Arriving
No - Time
6 From Pawhuska 11:10 an
7 From Muskogee :00
1 From Ft Smith 11 :56 am
3 Frown Wichita 8:40 pm
5 From Muskogee S:2pta
$ From Fawhuska 5:25 pm
01111301Mb TEAMS
Train t DePartIng
No 6 For Muskogee $:20 ant
1 For Wichita 12 :35 am
7 For Fawhuska ' :10 am
2 For Muskogee & Pt Smith 4:00 pm
8 For Muskogee 1:35 pm
6 For Pawhubits $:40 pm
The new phone number of The
Daily Legal Newt!' is 2-8986
DOW)
State of Oklahoma County of Tulsa ss:
In the District Court within and for said
County and State
CHARLES A BLISS Plaintiff vs MART
KRANTZ BLISS Defendant
No 29783
NOTICE BY PUBLICATION
The State of Oklahoma to Mary Krantz
Bliss :
Take notice that you have been sued
in the above named Court upon the
grounds of desertion and abandonment
for absolute divorce and must answer
the petition hied therein by said plaintiff
on or before the 27th day of February
1925 or said petition will be taken as
true and a judgment for said plaintiff for
absolute divorce will be rendered accord-
ingly HAL TURNER
(Seal) Court Clerk
By H D MAXWELL Deputy
BICKING & WILSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
1-16-2-6--3w
(8388)
Mk 110
(8$97)
In the District Court in and for Tulsa
County State of Oklahoma
No 29846
GRACE CULWELL Plaintiff vs W A
CULWELL Defendant
PUBLICATION NOTICE
The State of Oklahoma to the above
named Defendant!
Take notice that you have been sued
by the above plaintiff for divorce on the
grounds of habitual drunkenness and ex-
reme cruelty and unless you answer the
petition filed in said Court on or before
the 3rd day of March 1925 said petition
will be taken as true and judgment
granting to the plaintiff a divorce from
you according to the prayer thoreof
be rendered
Witness my hand and the seal of said
Court this 19th day of January 1925
(Seal)
HAL TURNER
Court Clerk
By H D MAXWELL Deputy
A CLAYTON SINCLAIR
Attorney for Plaintiff
1-20-2-10-3w
(S400)
ORDER FOR HEARING PETITION TO
SELL REAL ESTATE
No 128
State of Oklahoma Tulsa County in
County Court Broken Arrow Division
In the matter of the estate of Joe Chil-
ders and Elsie Childers Minors
Now on this 20th day of January 192s
comes Everett Cole as guardian of the
above estate having filed herein his pe-
tition for the sale of the real estate of
said wards for the reasons in said pe-
tition stated
It is ordered that said petition be and
hereby is set for hearing on the 20th day
of February A D 1925 at 10 o'clock A
M at which time the next of kin and all
persons interested in the above named
estate are required to appear and show
cause if any they have why an order
should not be granted for the sale of
so much real estate of said estate as is
necessary for the reasons in said pe-
tition stated and
First That notice thereof shall be
given by posting three copies hereof in
the county and
Second! That personal service hereof
be made upon raid next of kin and per-
sons interested in above named estate
Es required by law and
Third: That a copy of this order be
mailed with postage prepaid to all per-
sons interested not less than fourteen
days before the hearing of said petition
and
Fourth: It is further ordered that a
copy of this order be published for two
successive weeks three Thursdays issues
in the Tulsa Daily Legal News of Tulsa
Tulsa County Oklahoma
(Seal) NV L COFFEY
County Judge Pro Tem
Dated this 20th day of January 1925
Jan 22-29 Feb 5--2w
(8398)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
Tit the County Court of Tulsa County
State of Oklaboma
In the Matter of the Estate of MARY
E HAIGH Deceased
Probate No 5325
All persons having claims against Mary
E Haigh deceased are required to pre-
sent the same with the necessary vouch-
ers to the undersigned administrator at
-601 South Cat olina Street Tulsa Okla-
homa within four months of the date
hereof or the same will be forever
barred
Dated this 20th day of January 1925
JOB J HAIGH
Jan 22-29 Feb 5-2w 4 Executor
(8403)
In the District Court Within and for
Tulsa County State of Oklahoma
STATE OF OXIAAHOMA ex rel JOHN
M GOLDESBERRY as County Attor-
ney of Tulsa County Oklahoma Plain-
tiff vs J F SMITH LIZZIE GORDON
and B F MLLER Defendants
We 28894
NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE 021
REAL ESTATE
Notice is hereby given that in pur-
suance of a writ of execution issued out
of the °Mop of the Court Clerk in
and for the County and State aforesaid
bearing date the LOth day of ' January
1925 in a certain cause therein pending
wherein the State of Oklahoma is plain-
tiff and J F Smith Lizzie Gordon and
B F Diller are defendants command-
ing me to levy upon property of defend-
ants sufficient to satisfy a judgment
for Onp Thousand (81000) Dollars to-
gether with interest thereon at eix per
cent per annum from December eth 1924
and costs
I have levied upon the real estate
hereinafter described as the property of
Lizzie Gordon viz
Lot Number Twenty-two (22) Block
Fifteen (15) Gillette-Hall Addition to
the city of Tulsa
Now therefore notice is hereby given
that agreeable to thp commands ot said
writ of execution I will offer for sale
and sell for cash in hand to the highest
bidder the real estate above described
together with the improvements thereon
or as) much thereof as will satisfy such
judgment interPst and costs on the 23rd
day of February 1925 at 2 'clock p rn
of said day at the west 'front door of
the County Court House In the city of
Tulsa County and State aforesaid
- ' R D SANFORD
Sheriff of Tulsa County- Oklahoma
By CHAS PRICE Undersherift
1-22-2-22--30da
Ind News Phone No 2-8986
- (8406) ' t
State of Oklahoma County of Tulsksei
In the District Court R E HWIT
Plaintiff vs C C C WHITE et 114
NOTICE OF SlIFILIFF'S SALE
Notice is hereby given that in pUr-
suance of an order of rale issued out of
the District Court of Tulsa County Ok-
lahoma on the 19th day of January 1926 -41
In an action vherein R E Hunt was
plaintiff and C C C White and the
City of Tulsa Oklahoma a mtualcipal
corporation were defendants directed to
me the undersigned sheriff of Tulsa
Coinity Oklahoma corornanding me to
levy upon appraise and sell the follow-
ing described property:
Tho South Twenty (20) feet of the -
North Seventy-one (71) feet of Lot
Six (6) in Block Nine (9) of High- t '
lands Addition to the City of Tulsa
Oklahoma according to the duly re- -
corded plat thereof
to satisfy a judgment and decree of
foreclosure in favor of said plaintiff ob-
tained and made in said Court on the
28th day of July 1924 for the sum of
88060 and 7 per cent Interest per an-
num from the 6th day of September
1921 and $10000 attorneys fees with -
interest on said amounts from the date
of said judgment at 7 per cent per annum
until paid together with the costs of this
action and costs accruing: I will on the
23rd day of February 1925 at the hour
of 2 o'clock p m of said day at the
West Front Door of the Court House
In the City of Tulsa In said County -
and State offer for sale and sell to the
highest bidder for cash the said property
above described or so much thereof as
will satisfy say' judgment
Witness my hand this 19th day of
January 1925
R D SANFORD -
Sheriff
By CHAS PRICE Undersheriff
1-22 2-22-30das
dMMd1
(6896)
PUBLICATION NOTICE
In the Diatrict Court of Tulsa County
State of Oklahoma -
RU'rH ROSS Plaintiff vs HAREM
ROSS Defendant
No 29634
The State of Oklahoma to the above
named Defendant:
trou will take notice that you have
been sued in the above named Court by
the above plaintiff for a divorce on the
grounds of abandonment and non-support
and that unless you answer the petition
filed tsy this plc mtiff in said Court on or
before the 3rd day of March 1925 said
petition will be taken as true and Jude
ment granting to the plaintiff a divorce
annulling cancelling setting aside and
holding for naught the marriage contract
with you and for fifty dollars per month
alimony rendered according to the
prayer thereof
Witness my hand and the Deal of Said
Court tbis 19th day of January 1925
t Seal)
HAL TURNER
Court Clerk
By C R PHILBRICK Deputy
H E CHAMBERS
Attorney for Plaintiff
1-20-2-10-3w
MEMid
(8382)
State of Oklahoma County of Tulsa MP:
in the District Court
E M NILES Plaintiff vs D A ESTEY
G W PEASE WILLIS HARPER W
T SAULMAN and J L COCKR1U
Defendant&
No 23243
NOTICE BY PUBLICATION
The State of Oklahoma to Willis Harper
and W T Sau 'man:
You will take notice that you have been
sued in the District Court of Tulsa C01111'
ty State of Oklahoma in the above en-'
titled and numbered case and that unlese
you answer the petition of the plaintiff
on or before the 26th day of February
1925 said petition will be taken as this
tairt a judgment will be rendered against
you accordingly adjudging and decreeing
the plaintiff to have a valid and subsist-
ing :mortgage lien upon and covering the
following described realtestate and prem-
ises situated in Tulsa County Oklahoma
rto-wit:
The East Fifty Feet (E 50 ft) of
the West One Hundred Feet (W 100
ft) of Lots Twenty-three (23) and
Twenty-four (24) in Block Five (5)
of Adams Addition to the City of
Tulsa according to the recorded plat
thereof
securing the payment to her of the sum
of Six Hundred Seventy-nine and 17 100 '
(I67917) Dollars with interest at the rate
of 10 per cent per annum from the 10th
day of February 1923 and One Hundred
(2100) Dollars attorneys fees and all costa
of said action and adjudging and decree -
mg said mortgage io be paramount and
superior to any right title interest estate
lien or claim of you or either of you In I
tn or against the said property or any
part thereof and foreclosing the mort-
gage of the plaintiff and ordering said
property sold for the satisfaction thereof
Dated and issued this 12th day of Jam- s
nary 1925
HAL TURNER
t Seal) Court Clerk
Py C R PHILBRICK Deputy
Jan 15-22-29—Fcb 5---3s
(8382)
ORDER FOR BEARING PETITION TO -
SELL REAL ESTATE
State of Oklahoma Tulsa County
In County Court
In the Matter of the Estate of TULSA
DREW Minor
Now on this Tth day of January' 1924
comes EXCHANGE TRUST COMPANY
as Guardian of the above estate having
filed herein its petition for the sale of
the real estate belonging to said Talisa
Drew for the reasons in said petition
stated
It is ordered that said petition be and
hereby is set for hearing on the ilth V day
of February A D 1925 V at -10:00 o'clock
a tn at which time the next of kin andt
all persons interested In the above' named
estate are required to appear and show
calm if any they have why and order
should not be granted for the sale of se V
much real estate of said estates as is nee-
essary for the reason V in said petition
stated and
First That notice thereof shall be givers
hy posting three copies hereof in the
County and
Second: V That personal service hereof -
be made upon said next of kin and per-
sons interested in above named estate as
required by law and t
Third: It is further ordered that a copy
of this order be published for two nue
cessive weeks in the Tulsa Daily Legal
News of Tulsa Oklahoma- V VV
W L COFF'Et
(Seal) county judge pro tem V '
Jan 8-15-22-4w -
It Ton Want t Your Stenogroptile
-Work Done With Neatness lank Dis-
patch: Just Phone 119205—n!
CATHERINE MONROY -
STENOGRAPHER -
NOTARY -PUBLIC '
225 ATCO BUILDING TULSA
I
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
Rosen, Jennie C. Tulsa Daily Legal News (Tulsa, Okla.), Vol. 27, No. 18, Ed. 1 Thursday, January 22, 1925, newspaper, January 22, 1925; (https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc2130990/m1/6/: accessed July 17, 2024), The Gateway to Oklahoma History, https://gateway.okhistory.org; crediting Oklahoma Historical Society.