36 Matching Results
Search Results
Applied Filters
- Subpoena for Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company
- Subpoena for case 16,013 Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York. Includes an officers return showing the subpoena was served.
- Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York City, a corporation
- Civil Subpoena for Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York. Includes the court date of March 31, 1922, as well as the officers return stating the subpoena was served
- Praecipe for subpoena for Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York
- Praecipe for case number 16,013 Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York. Includes court date of March 31, 1922.
- Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York City, a corporation
- Subpoena for case 16,013 Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York City setting a court date of March 31,1922
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection filed by C.S. Younkman stating that the Johnson's do not have sufficient facts to bring the complaint against the defendant.
- Affidavit of attendance of witness in Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company
- Affidavit of attendance of C.H. Moore as a witness for the defendant.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection filed stating that the Johnsons have not brought a sufficient complaint to move against the defendant J.M. Adkinson.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection filed stating that the Johnsons do not have a sufficient complaint to bring against O.A. Steener.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection filed stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint to the defendant H.F. Newblock.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint against Geo H. Blaine.
- Demurrer James and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint to move against the National Surety Company.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection by the National Surety Company stating that the James A. Johnson did not bring a sufficient complaint to move against the company. Lists out the reasons.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint against U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company.
- James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Petition naming the City of Tulsa, various employees, and the National Surety Company as being complicit in the destruction of the property owned by the Johnson's.
- Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for several city of Tulsa employees for case number 23317 Emmett Johnson vs. the City of Tulsa for property damage.
- James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for several employees of the city of Tulsa and various insurance companies to appear in court for case number 23339 James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
- Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for insurance companies to appear in court in case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
- Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court for case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
- Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons of several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court in case number 23317 Emmet Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
- James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for employees of the city of Tulsa and insurance companies to appear in court for case number 23339 James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
- Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for employees from insurance companies to appear in court in case number 23317 Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court for case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
- Application to advance cause for Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York
- Application to send the suit to trial quickly. Continental Insurance Company quotes their riot clause as reason for not paying on the insurance policy.
- Amended Reply in Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York
- Amended reply to Continental Insurance Company regarding their objection evidence and facts presented by Mabel Allen.
- Affidavit of sworn testimony by Mabel Allen
- Affidavit signed by Mabel Allen stating that she has read a statement and the facts are true and correct.
- Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York, demurrer to evidence
- Objection to evidence brought by Mabel Allen in case number 16013
- Motion for judgement on the pleadings
- Motion for judgement on the pleadings by the Continental Insurance Company
- Summons in the case of Sarah Andrews vs. City of Tulsa
- Summons for several Tulsa city employees and the state insurance commissioner. The summons also mentions several insurance companies
- Motion for a new trial for Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York
- Motion for new trial after the defendants objected to the evidence brought by Mabel Allen.
- Payment for summons service
- Receipt of a payment of three dollars for the service of summons for the case of Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York. Case number 16013.
- Summons for the Continental Insurance Company of New York and the State Insurance Commissioner of Oklahoma
- District court summons for Continental Insurance Company of New York in case 16013.
- Summons for the Continental Insurance Company of New York and the State Insurance Commissioner of Oklahoma
- Summons for the Continental Insurance company in case number 16013 Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York.
- Order extending time for making and serving case made
- Order granting the plaintiff, Mabel Allen more time to prepare her case
- Motion for a new trial for Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York
- Order for a new trial after the defendants objected to the facts brought by Mabel Allen.
- Order granting the defendent, Continental Insurance Company more time to build their case.
- Order granting the Continental Insurance Company more time to build their case.
- Order extending time
- Order granting Mabel Allen more time to make her case.