80 Matching Results

Search Results

Praecipe for subpoena for Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York

Praecipe for case number 16,013 Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York. Includes court date of March 31, 1922.

Date: March 20, 1922

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for insurance companies to appear in court in case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.

Date: June 1, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court for case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.

Date: June 1, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court for case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.

Date: June 8, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Order of dismissal for case 23339 Rev. Jas. A. Johnson et al., vs City of Tulsa, et al.,

Date: July 6, 1937

Creator: Williams, Bradford J.

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Reverend James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Dismissal of case 23339 Rev. Jas. A. Johnson et al., vs City of Tulsa, et al.,

Date: June 30, 1937

Creator: Scott, Elisha

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection filed stating that the Johnsons have not brought a sufficient complaint to move against the defendant J.M. Adkinson.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection filed stating that the Johnsons do not have a sufficient complaint to bring against O.A. Steener.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint against U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection filed by C.S. Younkman stating that the Johnson's do not have sufficient facts to bring the complaint against the defendant.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Demurrer James and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint to move against the National Surety Company.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection filed stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint to the defendant H.F. Newblock.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint against Geo H. Blaine.

Date: July 14, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Objection by the National Surety Company stating that the James A. Johnson did not bring a sufficient complaint to move against the company. Lists out the reasons.

Date: November 9, 1925

Creator: Breckwelder and Bostick

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Petition naming the City of Tulsa, various employees, and the National Surety Company as being complicit in the destruction of the property owned by the Johnson's.

Date: May 31, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for several employees of the city of Tulsa and various insurance companies to appear in court for case number 23339 James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.

Date: May 31, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for employees of the city of Tulsa and insurance companies to appear in court for case number 23339 James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.

Date: June 1, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for several city of Tulsa employees for case number 23317 Emmett Johnson vs. the City of Tulsa for property damage.

Date: May 31, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons of several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court in case number 23317 Emmet Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.

Date: June 8, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for employees from insurance companies to appear in court in case number 23317 Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Date: June 5, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Application to advance cause for Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York

Application to send the suit to trial quickly. Continental Insurance Company quotes their riot clause as reason for not paying on the insurance policy.

Date: January 6, 1922

Creator: Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Answer to the petition of Mabel Allen by the Continental Insurance Company

Answer to the petition of Mabel Allen to sue for funds from an insurance policy held by the Continental Insurance Company.

Date: unknown

Creator: Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Summons in the case of Sarah Andrews vs. City of Tulsa

Summons for several Tulsa city employees and the state insurance commissioner. The summons also mentions several insurance companies

Date: May 31, 1923

Creator: District Court of Tulsa

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

Amended Reply in Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York

Amended reply to Continental Insurance Company regarding their objection evidence and facts presented by Mabel Allen.

Date: March 20, 1922

Creator: Spears, Franklin, and Chappelle

Location: 36.153982 -95.992775

Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society

The Gateway to Oklahoma History

80 Matching Results

Search Results

Add Filters

Applied Filters

Praecipe for subpoena for Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York

Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Reverend James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Demurrer James and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa

Application to advance cause for Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York

Answer to the petition of Mabel Allen by the Continental Insurance Company

Summons in the case of Sarah Andrews vs. City of Tulsa

Amended Reply in Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York