The Edmond Sun (Edmond, Okla.), Vol. 21, No. 34, Ed. 1 Thursday, March 24, 1910 Page: 8 of 12
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: Oklahoma Digital Newspaper Program and was provided to The Gateway to Oklahoma History by the Oklahoma Historical Society.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
THE JUDCL SAID
That the Husband Owns His Pay En-
That a Wife Has a Right to Go
Oyt of his $60 a month the husband,
so the wife averred, didn't give her
enough money. After both sides had
been heard these pearls of wisdom
fell from the bench:
"After the rent and the household
expenses have been paid you ought to
give your wife three dollars a week.
She's entitled to that much. She
DPICMIP takes care of the children and she
1/CiLpC never goes out of the house. She'll
save more money than you will outifcf
I that three dollars a week."
Through Her Husband's Pockets | pillow when I'm asleep," chipped in
Joliffe, "and—
"Your wife must get ber 20 per
cent regularly." declared the court,
waving aside the Indignant husband
and settling the matter for good and
all.
That a Wife Is Personally Entitled to
20 Per Cent of the Salary
That the Mother-in-Law Must Take
Care of Herself
That a Man s Wife Is Not His Servant
That a Married Woman May Go Out
When She Chooses
That What Is a Woman's Own Is
Her Own
That One Spanking Doesn't Count
That Wedding Gifts Belong to the
Wife
jj m at last we have it down In ever. The gist of them all is: Wives,
r black and white- the
black and white—the pay
envelope belongs solely to
the husband; it must be in-
violate. Fresh from the lips
of Magistrate Matthew P.
Breen of New York city
falls this newest decision in the
eternal question—who is boss, hus-
band or wife.
"Loudes vs. Loudes" was the case
In the Essex Market court for his
adjudication. In a word, Mrs. Loudes
sought an order directing Louis Lou-
des, her husband, of 14 Forsyth street,
to give her a certain amount weekly
out of his $15 pay envelope. Her plea
was that he gave her but 50 cents a
day for herself and the two children;
naturally she wanted more.
"My wife," protested Loudes, "wants
me to turn my pay envelope over to
her every Saturday night, sealed. She
wants me to give her every cent I
earn and make me beg her to hand me
out a nickel every time I want a cigar
or a glass of beer or car fare. That's
not a respectable position for a hus-
band and father to occupy."
Mrs. Loudes owned up to all this.
"You want too much," declared the
learned court In words that brooked
no argument. "To require your hus-
band to turn his unopened pay en-
velope over to you every week would
amount to tyranny of the sort most
dangerous to the perpetuation of the
home as the sacred institution it is to-
day. A wife has no right to make
such demands upon her husband. The
husband is the sole owner of the
fund."
Having gone thus far the court went
further and took np the other burning
question: Has the wife the right to
go through her husband's pockets?
Here Magistrate Breen sided with the
wife.
"If a man has the right sort of
wife," said the court slowly and delib-
erately, "I see not the slightest ob-
jection to his allowing her full free-
dom in going into his pockets while
he sleeps or under any other circum-
stances. The trouble with my wife
Is that she doesn't get enough when
she goes into my pockets!"
But the question was on the pay
envelope only, and not on the pocket,
and so the case was dismissed. As
for the pocket question the Breen de-
cision leaves it up in the air, because
all a husband has to say to knock it
out is that "the right sort of a wife."
to use Magistrate Breen's qualifying
clause, wouldn't want to go through
his pockets.
Fortunately, however, other Judges
have been more specific in recent de-
cisions on this vital Issue. And the
law is all with the wife. No law Is
needed for the husband on this vital
question, because, it is argued, can
the average husband find his wife's
pockets at all
Three decisions, recently handed
down in as many different parts of the
country, seem to settle the matter for-
go as far as you like!
WITHIN WIFELY RIGHTS.
In New York city Justice Newburger
In the supreme court has Just said it
is all right. Mrs. Adolph Schwartz
was suing her husband, a rich lawyer,
with offices in New York, San Fran-
cisco, Philadelphia, Chicago and other
cities. She searched her husband's
pockets and found letters from "that
other woman."
"Did you think that was right?"
asked Schwartz's lawyer.
"It was perfectly right to search his
pockets," announced the court de-
cisively when the lawyers began to
wrangle. "He was her husband."
In Omaha the case was more seri-
ous. Henry Mills was suing for di-
vorce before Judge Crawford. He al-
leged cruelty, said cruelty consisting
chiefly in the fact that she systematic-
ally searched his pockets for his
wages, leaving behind her only 15
cents a day for his car fare and beer,
MUST PAY BACK MONEY.
| Now, how about household borrow-
ing? Do you have to pay back money
you borrow from your wife? Of
| course there is no other side to the
question—the wife can't borrow from
the husband; he always gives it to
her. So, for the benefit of all hus-
bands who will persist in borrowing
from their wives, let it be said for
once and all, "You've got to pay it
back under the law." What's more,
the statute of limitations, which in-
validates an ordinary debt after a cer-
tain number of years, does not debar
the claim of a wife against the hus-
band for borrowed money.
This case came up In Bloomington,
111., before Judge Owen P. Thompson,
in the Green county circuit court,
when Mrs. Bessie Wald sued her hus-
band for $2,200 he had borrowed from
her. They subsequently quarreled and
separated. He refused to return the
One Spanking Doesn't Count.
tell her what he intended spending It
for, which was the cruelest kind of
cruelty, according to Mills. But not
according to the court, which decided,
in dismissing the suit, that it was the
wife's privilege.
"Man and his wife," said the court,
"are one, and the property that be-
longs to one is also the property of
the other; so, if a wife takes money
from the pocket of her husband with-
out first putting him in fear, it would
be impossible to make a charge of
robbery from the person, pocket-pick-
If Mills wanted more money he had to , money, and after many years Mrs.
take his wife into his confidence and , Waid sued her husband and won, even
triumphing over that bugbear of cred-
itors, the statute of limitations.
What's next to money when it comes
to making rifts in the domestic lute?
Don't all speak at once—you're all
right. Of course, it's the mother-in-
law! Can the husband's mother do
the "Poor John!" act around the
house? Is main-law privileged to
come and stay as long as she pleases
Just because poor, dear Marie is so
lonesome? No sirae! The courts are
unanimous on this question and with-
out any reservations whatsoever.
Mother must go. no matter which side
i of the house she comes from.
In the case of the Keerys it was the
husband siding with his mother. John
Keery, a prosperous New Jersey farm-
er, married a trained nurse and took
j her home.
"Feed the hogs and put in your
I other spare time working on the
farm!" was the gist of the orders
handed to the bride by the bride-
groom's mother, who lived on the
farm with them. Young Mrs. Keery
rebelled. Keery sided with his moth-
er, and so this particular Mrs. Newly-
wed left home and her husband's
mother. Then she sued for separate
maintenance, which was answered by
Keery that he was perfectly willing to
provide a home—his home—for her.
But there was ma!
And that spoiled all his otherwise
good defense in law. Vice-Chancellor
Stevenson, in Jersey City, held that
the mother-in-law couldn't be boss
and would have to go, or else Keery
would have to provide another home
for his wife.
In other words, the mother-in-law
must go!
A Husband Must Pay Back What He
Borrows.
ing, or even common larceny He. Case
dismissed."
Head now what Justice Mullowney
of the Washington (D. C.) police court
says in the case of Ridgway vs. Rldg-
way—a decision handed down when
George Ridgway was arrested on his
wife's complaint because she feared
bodily injury when he discovered she
had been ransacking his pockets for
the last nickel therein. Says the
learned court:
"It shows the interest the woman
has in the man. It shows that the
woman loves the man. A woman who
does not go through her husband's
pockets does not love him. They all
do it."
ENTER THE THIRD PERSON.
Quite enough when the contents of
the pocket searched belong to the hus-
band. But when something is taken
belonging to n third party the situa-
tion is wholly different, as Mrs. John
White of Cincinnati learned to her
sorrow.
Miss Anna Chapman gave her gold
watch to John White to take to a
watchmaker's to be repaired. In her
New
Ztr £:.</. &lw&rtJ.s
Manning's Message to Arthur
*
The Mother-ln-Law Must Look Out for
Herself.
tects the husband's bank account from
the wife. She can go through his
pockets and she can work or not, as
she pleases, but his savings are im-
mune.
Mrs. Ernest C. Quick of Asbury
Park withdrew about $600 of her hus-
band's money from the Citizens' Na-
tional bank at Long Branch and
placed it in her own name. But Quick,
true to his name, promptly got out an
injunction restraining his wife from
spending a cent of the money! And
he's got the money yet.
SOME CHICAGO DECISIONS.
You may slap your wife, but you
musn't pinch her—at least in Chi-
cago. Judge Barnes made these dis-
tinctions in the superior court where
cruelty cases are tried.
In Chicago, too, a husband may
swear at his wife, according to the
decision of Municipal Judge Gemmill.
Mrs. Joseph Tollno wanted her hus-
band put In jail for swearing at her
and threatening all sorts of things
which he didn't do.
"I won't issue a warrant of arrest
on such charges," declared the judge,
and so it goes as law.
In Athol, Mass., Judge Frederick
Dunn wasn't so sure of his ground
when Mrs. E. A. Garry had her hus-
band arrested for assault and battery
because he tickled her In the ribs.
The court admitted that the issue was
beyond its judicial attainments and
dismissed the case without prejudice.
One evening when Chauncey Mc-
Knight of New York city came home
he found his wife "cutting up," as he
expressed it, and decided to discipline
her. So he laid her across his knee
and administered a sound spanking.
Then he sued for separation on the
ground that his wife was addicted to
tho use of liquor.
Justice Truax, before whom the
case came in the supreme court, was
up a legal tree. Finally he compro-
mised and ordered the wife to live
with the husband and the husband to
pay the wife $15 a week. In other
words, the spanking doesn't count
ROUGH ON THE HUSBAND.
Now turn to this sad story—where
a dutiful husband has to pay the pen-
alty for his wife's assault. Mrs. George
Owens attacked and assaulted Mrs.
Ellen HUbert in Wilkosbarre, Pa.
Owens was present at the time. And
just because he made no effort to stop
his wife he was convicted for her as-
sault and had to pay the penalty!
New decisions hold that the wed-
ding gifts belong to the wife; that a
wife can't do as she pleases; that It
isn't cruel for a husband to make a
Interesting Bit of Inside History Is
Revealed Concerning the Blaine-
Cleveland Presidential Carry
. paign of 1884.
By E. J. EDWARDS.
One afternoon in late June of 1884,
at the time of day in summer when all
Washington is drowsy, I went into
Jackson square, which faces the White
House, to get a little relief in the
shade from the heat of the day. A
week earlier I had returned from the
Republican national convention at Chi-
cago, which nominated Blaine for the
presidency, with President Arthur as
his leading opponent. The Democratic
convention was to meet in the same
city the first week in July, and it was
the general impression that Grover
Cleveland would be the Democratic
nominee.
As I strolled through the park, some
one called me by name, and when I
looked up to return the greeting, there
stood president Arthur himself. He
greeted me cordially, told me that he
was on his way to Secretary of State
Freylinghuysen's house, and added
that he would be delighted if I would
walk over with him and tell him some
of the interesting features of the Re-
publican convention. "You see," he
added, by way of explanation, "I
haven't heard much about them. Very
few of my friends who were there
have yet returned to Washington."
Naturally, among other matters, I
told the president that at one time he
probably could have been nominated,
had he had a good general on the
ground "And," I added, "the general
impression is, Mr. President, that had
you been nominated, you would have
been reasonably sure of election."
"Yes, I think I would hive been
elected," replied the president, "for I
have reason to believe that New York
state would have supported me, and I
am afraid there is considerable doubt
of the ability of Mr. Blaine to carry
the state."
We walked along in silence for a
few moments.
"I am not basing my Judgment that
I would have carried New York state
upon any false confidence or vanity,"
continued the president. "Some of
my Democratic friends believe that I
would have received a plurality of at
least 30,000 votes in the state. One
of these friends Is Daniel Manning of
Albany.
"I have known Mr. Manning for
many years, and our personal rela-
tions have been very cordial. Two or
three weeks before the Republican
convention met, Mr. Manning came to
Washington to see me. Previously, he
had sent word that he was anxious to
see me and asked me not to let the
fact that he was going to visit me be-
come known. Of course, you, at this
time, will not print what I am now
telling you.
"Mr. Manning was with me the
greater part of a Sunday afternoon.
We talked very freely about political
conditions. He asked me if I believed
the chances were in favor of my nomi-
nation at Chicago, and I replied that
my friends thought that my chances
were fair.
"'Well,' he said, 'it will either be
you or Blaine, and one of the reasons
that I have come to Washington is to
tell you confidentially that if you are
the candidate, then, in all probability,
no effort will be made to bring about
the nomination of Grover Cleveland
for president at the Democratic con-
vention. But if Blaine is nominated,
then the nomination of Cleveland is
certain. I will tell you the reason. We
are convinced that if you are nomi-
nated you will carry the state. Cleve-
land himself is confident of that, and
he does not want the nomination un-
less there is a very good chance of
his election. If Blaine is nominated,
Cleveland can and will beat him in
New York state—and so secure the
election because Blaine will be badly
cut wherever Roscoe Conkling has a
strong following. But if you are nomi-
nated, I am inclined to think that the
Democratic nomination will go to Ran-
dall, possibly to Bayard.'
"Of course," added the president, "I
did not tell Manning that I felt very
grave doubts about the ability of
Blaine to carry New York state. I
hope he can carry it But I can say
to you now that the Democratic na-
tional convention will nominate
Grover Cleveland. And I shall be
very apprehensive of the result until
the votes are counted."
To make perfectly clear that Mr.
Manning knew what he was talking
about, it is only necessary to add that
he contributed greatly to Cleveland's
election as governor of New York, to
his nomination and election as presi-
dent. and became President Cleve-
land's first secretary of the treasury.
(Copyright, 11)09, by E. J. Edwards.)
Edison's First Book Keeping
Wizard's Two Spikes for "What Is
Owed Me" and "What I Owe"
Discarded When He Be-
came Rich.
By E. J. EDWARDS.
Thomas A. Edison now knows the
value of money, the independence and
the sense of power which it gives.
But there was a time in his early ex-
perience when he had no other con-
ception of money than that it was a
good thing to have in the pocket, so
that it could be taken out and spent
whenever any of it was needed.
Soon after Edison had perfected his
incandescent light, he found himself
in the possession of capital for the
first time in his life. That light,
within ten years after it was perfect-
ed, brought him a capital of some
$3,000,000. Wrhen he told me this I
Hamlin s Journey of Love
His Last Public Service Was a Plea
for the Universal Establish-
ment of a Lincoln Memo-
rial Day.
By E. J. EDWARDS.
If Hannibal Hamlin, vice-president
of the United States during Lincoln's
first term in the White House, were
alive to-day he undoubtedly would
wife accompany him on his travels; kf a deal o( 8atisfaction 1n
that a wife may slash a husband s |
clothing if she feels like It; that a
wife is a chattel and may be sought
with a search warrant; that a hus-
band may stay out till 10:30 p. m.;
WIFE NOT A SERVANT.
There are two new decisions re-
garding Just how much work a wife
must do. In Ohio she can get off
with little or none. A housewife may
lie abed late, let the dishes go un-
washed, refuse to mend her husband's
clothes, neglect to sweep, and still be
deemed a true and loving helpmate.
James Young sued for a divorce at
Lima, O.. on those grounds, and Judge
Quail dismissed his plea of gross neg-
lect and refused him the relief prayed
for—a divorce.
"A man's wife Is not his servant!"
was the gist of the derision.
Nor is she to be a household drudge
in New Jersey, under the latest de-
custoinarv search of her husband's clslon at Bayonne. Mrs. Charles Glero
pockets Mrs. White found the time haled her husband to court, charging
piece and confiscated it So Miss him with choking her. Glere pro-
Chapman had her arrested. tested and added that she never was
The Solomon in this case was Judge ! at home.
Pumont. Miss Chapman pot her "Why, judge," he exclaimed, bitter-
watch, Mrs White her freedom and ly, "many's the time I've come home
White the angry v. ord from both from work only to.be told to get my
"Let this be a warning to all wives," own supper. I've often washed the
said Judge Dumont dishes and made the beds for fear my
There are various phases of this de- | friends might drop In and Bee every-
clslon which gets back to the root of thing upset."
til evil money If a husband can j And this Is what Glere got from
Perfectly Right to Search
His PocktU,
have some say over bis earnings, how
much must he give the wife? In Mis-
souri the rule is 20 per cent.
The Jollffes, husband and wife, have
Just had that little matter settled.
Mrs. J. W. JollfTe had her husband be-
fore Judge Kyle In Kansas Cltf,
charged with disturbing her peace.
Recorder Lazarus:
"A married woman has a perfect
right to go out when she pleases, and
should not be expected to spend all
her time in drudgery."
And to rub It in on the husband he
had to pay a $10 fine!
On the other hand, Jersey law pro-
the fact that 14 of the states have bo
! far made of Lincoln's birthday a
! legal holiday. For he it was who
I really started and crystallized the
that a wife may be high-spirited; that:
if a woman marries a six-dollar man
movement that has led to legal ob-
servance of the day, though I believe
. . . . . „ | you won't find this stated in any ac-
8h« " 1 "pect„hlra„ 0 '"PP°rt„hT : count of the establishment of the day
and that the nationality of a wife Is
controlled by that of her husband.
And lastly, balm for suffering hus-
bands—a $50 hat is not a household
necessary! A husband in moderate
circumstances doesn't have to pay
auch a milliner's bill. Oh, Joy!
So goes out the decision from Chi-
cago for all the world to hear. L. W.
Ferguson was Bued for a $165 mil-
linery bill contracted by his wife, she
not having his approval for the pur-
chase. Three bachelors were in the
Jury, too.
Collect from the wife—if you can,"
was the verdict.
A Married Woman Has a Perfect
Rtflht to Go Out Whon She Chooses.
as a legal holiday.
Mr. Hamlin, who was almost the
last survivor of those who were of
the immediate administrative family
of Mr. Lincoln, died in 1891 in
Bangor, Me. It so chanced that In
February of that year I was a passen-
ger on the Boston express for New
York, and after dining, I went into
the smoking car. A moment or two
later a sturdy old gentleman entered,
threw himself easily upon one of the
divans, took from his pocket a very
black cigar, lighted it and began
smoking. It was Hannibal Hamlin,
looking not a day older than he did
when, on his retirement from the sen-
ate in March of 1881, I had bade him
good-by in Washington.
Quite naturally, we renewed our ac-
quaintance, and after a little conversa-
tion I expressed interest in the self-
evident fact that he, in the dead of
winter and at his age, should be mak-
ing a rather lengthy railroad trip.
"Now, you are not going to inter-
view me," declared the old gentleman,
with a smile. "I never have been in-
terviewed, and I don't purpose to be-
gin now; but I will tell you confi-
dentially what the object of my trip is
"Sometimes it used to be said,
when Mr. Lincoln was president, that
he ignored me. but that is not true.
My relations with President Lincoln
were not only cordial, but Intimate,
although the public knew little of
them. And I came, In that Inter-
course, to have what I believe to be a
true understanding of Lincoln's char-
acter. Although he was intellectually
a great man, yet I think that his real
greatness lay in the moral grandeur
of his character. He was, morally, as
great as Washington. That is, after
all, the only true greatness.
| "Now, sometime ago, as I was slt-
I ting In a little club down In Bangor
that I go to every day to play cards
and sometimes to chat about men and
the politics of an earlier day, it
seemed to me that there ought to be
some formal way of recognizing per-
manently, and by all the country and
by future generations, the moral char-
acter of this great leader. After
thinking the idea over, it occurred to
me that the best way would be for
every state to set apart Lincoln's
birthday as a memorial day, and bo I
decided to go to New York and to
Philadelphia, and possibly to Wash-
ington, where I could meet some old
friends and make an earnest plea for
the national establishment of Lin-
coln's birthday as a memorial.
"I am now making this journey. I
have not much more time left me be-
fore I join those who were associated
with Mr. Lincoln and who have passed
on; and I want my last public service
to be a plea for the universal estab-
lishment in the United States of Lin-
coln Memorial Day."
A few months later, in the summer
of the same year, Hannibal Hamlin
lay dead in his home in Bangor. But
the plea for the memorial observance
of Lincoln's birthday which he made
on that day before the New York
Lincoln club, and his subsequent pri-
vate effort both in New York and
Philadelphia unquestionably led to
and crystallized the agitation, which,
several years later, caused Illinois,
Minnesota and New York to be the
first states to declare the birth date
of the great war president a legal
holiday. For, until Mr. Hamlin con-
ceived the idea of a universal Lincoln
memorial day, and, at 82 years of
age, and in the dead of winter, made
his Journey in love in its behalf, there
had been no determined concerted ef-
fore to make tho day a legal holiday
in any state, and it was only observed
informally at banquets by Lincoln
clubs and other organizations.
(Copyright, 1SK>9. by E. J. Edwards.)
A Flat Joke.
The table was set in the little din-
ing room, nnd from the adjoining cub-
by corner the two gazed in admiration
upon the decorations which surround-
ed their board.
"Wouldn't it be nn honor, John,"
cooed the bride softly, "if we could
have the president with us for din-
ner to-morrow?"
"Honor," laughed John uproarious-
ly as he contemplated the little allot-
ted by the grasping landlord, "why,
it would be moro than that, it would
be a feat."—Illustrated Sunday Maga-
zine.
asked him if he handled his accounts
and looked after his money with the
same systematic method which char-
acterized his pursuit of science. He
smiled for a moment, as though some
amusing recollection had come to
him.
"Well," he said, "I know now how
to secure competent assistants who
will look carefully and accurately
after the business end of my under-
takings. But there was a time when
I was as green about such things as
a boy who hoes corn upon prairies
would be. That was when I had re-
ceived several thousand dollars in
part payment for my microphone
transmitter patent, which, as you
know, aided vitally the perfecting of
the telephone.
"This was the first 'big money,' so
to speak, that I had ever possessed,
and with it I decided to establish my
own plant and laboratory and begin
work upon the other things I had in
mind. So I secured a place in Jersey
City, equipped it and started to work.
"I was pretty much the whole
thing about the plant. I figured out
that the best way for me to keep my
accounts was the simplest; so I had
two spikes made, each about the
thickness of an ordinary telegraph
wire, sharp at one end and stuck at
the other end into a leaden support
or base. Upon one of these lead
bases 1 pasted a strip of paper upon
which I had inked these words:
'What is owned me.' Upon the other,
I pasted another slip of paper, upon
which I had written the words: 'What
I owe.' One stood at one side of my
desk, and the other at the opposite
corner. What was owed me was at
my right hand, because that was of
more consequence.
"So, when I had done and sold a
piece of work, I stuck a memorandum
upon the spike to tell what was com-
ing to me. When I got any bills
against myself, I stuck those upon the
other spike. I thought that at the
end of a month, or certainly at the
end of a year, these memoranda would
match one another, and what was left
would fill my pockets. Sometimes,
while I was filling these spikes, I got
short of actual money, and the bank
would cash my note. I had learned
as much as that. Then I never paid
any more attention to it, till one day
I would receive a notice saying that
ray note had gone to protest. I
thought that was the way the bank
had of telling me that it was due, so
I would shin around and get the
money to pay the note. The bank
never made any objection. I guess
they understood me.
"At the end of the first year my
methods of keeping accounts showed
me that I had made quite a good bit
of money. There wasn't any mistak
ing the accounts. There was the rec-
ord. I had made the money—no
[ doubt of that. And then it occurred
j to me: 'Where is that money? I
I haven't got it; the bank hasn't got it,
and yet I have surely had it.' I puz-
zled over the problem for a time, then
I became satisfied with the thought
that I had had the money, and let it
go at' that. But afterwards, when I
had moved to Menlo Park, I saw that
that way of Keeping accounts
wouldn't do. So I hired a bookkeeper
and cashier, and since then have
never bothered myself about that end
of my affairs."
(Copyright, 1909. by E. J. Edwards.)
The Only Way.
"Nobody listens to advice."
"You're wrong. One fellow always
does."
' Who's that?"
"The fellow who's giving It"—Ex-
change.
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
The Edmond Sun (Edmond, Okla.), Vol. 21, No. 34, Ed. 1 Thursday, March 24, 1910, newspaper, March 24, 1910; Edmond, Oklahoma. (https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc150240/m1/8/: accessed April 25, 2024), The Gateway to Oklahoma History, https://gateway.okhistory.org; crediting Oklahoma Historical Society.