Tulsa Daily Legal News (Tulsa, Okla.), Vol. 3, No. 132, Ed. 1 Friday, June 6, 1913 Page: 3 of 6
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: Oklahoma Digital Newspaper Program and was provided to The Gateway to Oklahoma History by the Oklahoma Historical Society.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Friday, June 6, 1913
Tulsa Daily Legal Newa
DISTRICT COURT
(Continued from page 1.)
ASSIGNMENT OF EQUITY CASES.
Monday, June 16, 1913.
3510—S. R. Lewis, et al vs. William
Lynch.
3518—James Egan vs. John M. Ingram,
et al.
3320—Price Sand Co., vs The St. Louis
& S. F. Ry. Co.
1048—W. S. Wagner vs. Thomas Pear-
sin, et al
1350—Timothy M. Stanclift ,et al, vs.
Andrew L. Hansom, et al.
Tuesday, June 17, 1913.
1409—M. H. Butts vs. Edward Crowell,
et al.
1672—D. B. Crewson vs. A. M. Hassler.
1764—Big Five Oil & Gas Co. vs: Isaac
A. Wilson, et al.
1786—Lizzie Fields vs. G. A. Ward et al.
1834—Lillie Jackson, et al, vs. J. S. Mof-
fit, et al.
Tulsa Music Company
The Leading Piano
House
Second and Boston
SEE US BEFORE YOU BUY
Wednesday, June 18, 1913.
1914—St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. vs. H. T,
Richardson, et al.
2009—Rachel Perryman vs. John R.
Skinner, et al.
2532—Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.
vs. J. Z. Smith, et al.
2026—Bank of Oklahoma vs. M. B.
Wells, et al.
2055—W. C. Edwards, et al, vs. John
Rowe, et al.
2172—In re condemnation proceedings
to establish public road over the
lands of Rosella Fee, a minor.
2739—Okla. National Bank vs. Tulsa
Paving and Building Brick Co,
et al.
Monday, June 23, 1913.
2776—In re application of the Sand
Springs Interurban Ry. Co.
2804—Louella Palmer vs. Louella Palm-
er, et al.
2884—George Fields vs. A. B. Roberts,
et al.
2890—Root Glass Co., et al, vs. J. D.
Vance, et al.
2909—George W. Friesen vs. Mary
Bruce, et al.
Thursday, June 19, 1913.
2184—Te Ke Co Con Nay Squire vs.
International Land Co, et al.
2196—Minerva Brown vs. John S. Bilby.
2248—Eva Coleman Henderson, et al,
vs. T. J. Kelly, et al.
2358—Charles A. Sanderson vs. J. Fred
Dee, et al.
2371—Henry E. Taylor vs. L. B. Camp-
bell, et al.
Friday, June 20, 1913.
2591—J. W. Orr, et al, vs. Edward Rim-
merman, et al.
2653—Francis A. Wilson vs. Leo L.
Quinn, et al.
2694—The Texas Company vs. Okla-
homa Union Traction Co.
2724—Leoria L. Twist vs. Hazel Dick-
erson, Admr. ,et al.
Tuesday, June 24, 1913,
2913—In re dissolution of Hammett &
Gillispie Oil Co.
3002—Gladys Belle Oil Co., et al, vs.
C. S. Avery, et al.
3008—Sampson Saber, et al, vs. Ethel
Davis, et al.
3012—B. Robenivitz, et al, vs. First
National Bank of Collinsville.
3162—In re erroneous assessment M.
V. Ry. Co.
Thursday, June 26, 1913.
3234—George W. Mowbray vs. Jay For-
sythe.
3236 A. J. Hunt, et al, vs. Samuel C.
Davis, et al.
3262—Gladys Belle Oil Co. vs. Vika Oil
Co., et al.
3287—J. D. Miller vs. Tom Miller, et al.
3314—Midland Valley Railroad Co. vs.
Silas S. Mohrman, et al.
Friday, June 27. 1913.
3337—Charles Page vs. C. B. Lynch,
et al.
33o6—Robert Slater vs. Lulah Smythe
et al.
3365—F. D. McDonell vs. D. E. Lamb,
et al.
3404—Gertrude Warner vs. Exeter Oil
Co., et al.
3436—Ellis Fisher vs. R. J. Dixon, et al.
3438 Stephen C. Maxfield, et al, vs.
Frank Z. Curry.
W W. STUCKEY,
Clerk.
Wednesday, June 25, 1913.
3170—A. R. Lewis vs. Walter B. Gray-
son, et al.
3176—James F. McCoy vs. R. L. Martin,
et al.
NOTICE BY PUBLICATION.
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County—ss.
in the Superior Court. No. 1202.
c- S- Coley, Pearl Phipps and E. B.
W orrmngton, Plaintiffs,
vs.
The Unknown Heirs of Silanie Gray, De-
ceased, Defendants.
I he said defendants, the unknown heirs
of Silanie Gray, deceased, will take notice
3198—Ada Brown, et al, vs. Bulah Fos- that they have’been sued in the above
ter, nee Brown, et al.
3218— John V. Stanley vs. Edgar A.
Rippey.
3219— Bertha Price Adams vs. L. T.
Crosby, Jr.
C O. WINTERRINGER G. W. McCULLOUGH
MOWBRAY UNDERTAKING CO.
Phones
329
86
911
Phones
329
86
911
125 EAST SECOND STREET
TULSA, OKLA
named court by C. S. Ooley, Pearl Phipps
and E. B. Wormington to quiet the title
of the North West Quarter (NW&) of the
North West Quarter (NWy4) of Section
i hirty-Five (35) Township Eighteen (18)
North of Range Thirteen (13) East, in
3 ulsa County, Oklahoma, as against the
__ said defendants, and for a judgment
aga.nst said defendants, that they have
no interest, claim, estate, title or lien up-
on said above described property and said
defendants must answer the petition filed
in said Superior Court of Tulsa County.
Oklahoma, by said plaintiffs, on or before
the 15th day of July, 1913, or said peti-
tion will be taken as true and a judg-
ment for said plaintiffs quieting the title
in them to the following described real
estate, to-wit: NW% of NW%, Secern
35. Township 18 N. R. 13 blast, Tulsa
C ounty, Oklahoma, and a farther judg-
ment that the said defendants, the un-
known heirs of said Silanie Gray, deceas-
ed. have no right, title, claim, interest or
estate in and to said above described
premises will be rendered accordingly.
Attest: FRANK INGRAHAM.
SEAL Clerk of said Court.
C. S. Ooley. Pearl Phipns and E.
B. Wormington.
Rv Martin, Rush & Moss, Their Attorneys
6-3-3w.
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
Tulsa Daily Legal News (Tulsa, Okla.), Vol. 3, No. 132, Ed. 1 Friday, June 6, 1913, newspaper, June 6, 1913; Tulsa, Oklahoma. (https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc1172142/m1/3/: accessed March 28, 2024), The Gateway to Oklahoma History, https://gateway.okhistory.org; crediting Oklahoma Historical Society.